...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical neurophysiology >Vestibular testing by electrical stimulation in patients with unilateral vestibular deafferentation: galvanic evoked myogenic responses testing versus galvanic body sway testing.
【24h】

Vestibular testing by electrical stimulation in patients with unilateral vestibular deafferentation: galvanic evoked myogenic responses testing versus galvanic body sway testing.

机译:单侧前庭脱除咖啡因的患者通过电刺激进行前庭测试:电诱发的肌原性反应测试与电摇摆测试。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the agreement of a lesion site as indicated by two different vestibular tests with electrical stimulation, galvanic body sway testing (GBST) and galvanic evoked myogenic responses (galvanic vestibular evoked myogenic potential; galvanic VEMP) testing, in patients with unilateral vestibular deafferentation. METHODS: Nineteen patients with unilateral vestibular deafferentation were studied, and the criteria for patient selection were as follows: (1) absence of a caloric response to ice water on the affected side in a supine position, and (2) absence of VEMP to 95 dBnHL clicks on the affected side. We assessed the postural response of the subjects to long duration galvanic stimulation (1 mA, 5 s) by measuring the lateral displacement at the center of foot pressure with a cathode electrode on the forehead, and an anode electrode on the mastoid (GBST). We also recorded the electromyographic (EMG) activities of the sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) to short duration galvanic stimulation (3 mA, 1 ms) (galvanic VEMP) with a cathode electrode on the mastoid, and an anode electrode on the forehead. RESULTS: In 18 of the 19 patients, the lesion site indicated by GBST was identical to that indicated by galvanic VEMP. Fourteen patients had abnormal results in both tests while 4 patients had normal results in both tests. One patient with acoustic neuroma had normal results in GBST but abnormal results in galvanic VEMP. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that electrical stimulation in these two tests stimulates the same area of the peripheral vestibular afferent system, although the duration of stimulation was different, and that the estimate of the lesion site indicated by these tests in patients with complete or nearly complete unilateral vestibular damages is reliable. SIGNIFICANCE: These results suggest that short-duration galvanic stimulation as well as long-duration galvanic stimulation stimulates the vestibular system at the same level.
机译:目的:通过单侧前庭患者的两种不同的前庭测试与电刺激,电体摇摆测试(GBST)和电诱发的肌原性反应(电前庭诱发的肌原性潜力;电VEMP)测试来研究病变部位的一致性失职。方法:对19例单侧前庭脱除咖啡因的患者进行了研究,患者选择的标准如下:(1)仰卧位患侧对冰水的热量反应不存在,(2)VEMP至95 dBnHL单击受影响的一侧。我们通过用额头上的阴极电极和乳突上的阳极电极(GBST)测量足底压力中心的侧向位移,评估受试者对长时间电刺激的姿势反应(1 mA,5 s)。我们还记录了胸锁乳突肌(SCM)对短时电刺激(3 mA,1 ms)(电VEMP)的肌电图(EMG)活动,乳突上的阴极电极,前额上的阳极电极。结果:在19例患者中的18例中,GBST指示的病变部位与电动VEMP指示的病变部位相同。两项检查中有14例结果异常,而两项检查中4例结果均正常。一名听神经瘤患者的GBST结果正常,而电动VEMP结果异常。结论:这些结果表明,尽管刺激的持续时间不同,但这两个试验中的电刺激刺激外周前庭传入系统的相同区域,并且这些试验所指示的病变部位的估计是对完全或接近完全的患者单侧前庭损伤是可靠的。意义:这些结果表明,短时电刺激和长时电刺激可在相同水平上刺激前庭系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号