...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical neurophysiology >Galvanic and acoustic vestibular stimulation activate different populations of vestibular afferents.
【24h】

Galvanic and acoustic vestibular stimulation activate different populations of vestibular afferents.

机译:电流和声学前庭刺激可激活不同数量的前庭传入。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To deduce whether similar or distinct populations of vestibular afferents are activated by acoustic and galvanic vestibular stimulation by comparing the effectiveness of 'matched' stimuli in eliciting vestibulospinal reflexes. METHODS: Twelve subjects (5 men, 7 women) underwent individual 'matching' of 2 ms tone burst and galvanic stimuli, using vestibulocollic reflexes so that corrected reflex amplitudes to tone burst and galvanic stimuli were within 10% of each other. These same intensities were then administered using 20 ms durations to determine whether they were equally effective in evoking vestibulospinal responses. RESULTS: Corrected reflex amplitudes for vestibulocollic responses to tone burst and galvanic stimulation were not significantly different for the right (P=0.45) or left (P=0.68) sides. All subjects had vestibulospinal responses to galvanic stimulation (average intensity 4.0 mA for both sides). The short latency (SL) and medium latency (ML) components of the vestibulospinalreflexes were larger after galvanic compared to tone burst stimulation in 11 of 12 subjects (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Despite evoking equal-sized vestibulocollic reflexes, there was a clear dissociation between the magnitude of tone burst and galvanic-induced vestibulospinal reflexes. Galvanic stimulation evoked SL and ML reflexes in all subjects. Tone burst stimuli evoked only small SL reflexes and, in most cases, no ML reflexes. Acoustically-evoked vestibulocollic reflexes are likely to be due to saccular excitation. The limited effectiveness of longer tone burst stimuli to evoke ML vestibulospinal reflexes suggests that saccular afferents have, at most, only a minor role in the production of these reflexes. We conclude that galvanic stimulation is more effective in eliciting vestibulospinal reflexes than tone burst stimulation, and that the two methods activate different populations of vestibular afferents.
机译:目的:通过比较“匹配”刺激引起前庭-脊髓反射的有效性,推论出前庭传入或原声刺激是否激活了相似或不同的前庭传入群体。方法:十二名受试者(5名男性,7名女性)分别进行了2 ms的音爆和电刺激的“匹配”,使用前庭结肠反射,使对音爆和电刺激的校正反射幅度彼此相差10%以内。然后使用20 ms的持续时间给予相同的强度,以确定它们在诱发前庭脊髓反应中是否同样有效。结果:右侧(P = 0.45)或左侧(P = 0.68)的前庭胶体对音爆和电流刺激的反射幅度校正无明显差异。所有受试者对电刺激都有前庭脊髓反应(两侧平均强度为4.0 mA)。电刺激后,前庭脊髓反射的短潜伏期(SL)和中潜伏期(ML)分量比12名受试者中的11名音爆裂刺激要大(P <0.01)。结论:尽管诱发了大小相等的前庭结肠反射,但是在声爆发的大小和电流引起的前庭脊髓反射之间存在明显的分离。电流刺激引起所有受试者的SL和ML反射。音调爆发刺激仅引起较小的SL反射,在大多数情况下不引起ML反射。听觉诱发的前庭结肠反射很可能是由于囊性兴奋引起的。较长的音调爆发刺激引起ML前庭脊髓反射的效果有限,这表明在这些反射的产生中,囊泡传入的作用最多。我们得出的结论是,电刺激比音爆裂刺激更能引起前庭脊髓反射,并且这两种方法可以激活前庭传入的不同人群。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号