...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Medical Directors Association >The accuracy of Minimum Data Set diagnoses in describing recent hospitalization at acute care facilities.
【24h】

The accuracy of Minimum Data Set diagnoses in describing recent hospitalization at acute care facilities.

机译:最小数据集诊断在描述急性护理机构最近住院期间的准确性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is the resident assessment instrument used to guide clinical care, reimbursement, and assess quality in long-term care facilities. This database has been used in many studies, although the accuracy of many data elements remains unknown. This study evaluated the accuracy of the MDS diagnosis variables with respect to the diagnoses for recent hospitalization from Medicare claims data. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: 945 skilled nursing facilities in Ohio. PARTICIPANTS: 17,294 residents admitted from an acute care facility during 2000. MEASUREMENTS: Eleven diagnoses listed in the MDS were compared with Medicare hospital discharge claims. Specifically, each MDS diagnosis was compared to the primary diagnosis, the list of secondary diagnoses, and the Diagnosis Related Group (DRG). RESULTS: Claims diagnoses were listed in the MDS with an average frequency of 79% (range: 31%-94%) for the primary diagnosis, 66% (range: 33%-90%) for any diagnosis, and 71% (range: 31%-94%) for the DRG. MDS diagnoses were listed as the primary diagnosis, any diagnosis, and DRG with an average frequency of 20% (range: 6%-81%), 62% (range: 41%-86%), and 19% (range: 7%-84%), respectively, with only hip fracture listed more than 80% of the time. CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of the MDS for listing diagnoses from recent hospitalization appears good for most diagnoses. However, except for hip fracture, the MDS has poor predictive value with regard to the primary reason for the preceding hospitalization; this may have implications for resident care planning and the utility of this database in long-term care research.
机译:目标:最低数据集(MDS)是用于评估长期护理设施中的临床护理,费用报销和评估质量的居民评估工具。尽管许多数据元素的准确性仍然未知,但该数据库已用于许多研究中。这项研究根据Medicare索赔数据评估了MDS诊断变量相对于近期住院诊断的准确性。设计:回顾性队列研究。地点:俄亥俄州有945个熟练的护理机构。参加者:2000年期间,有17,294名居民从急诊设施入院。测量:将MDS中列出的11种诊断与Medicare医院出院索赔进行了比较。具体而言,将每个MDS诊断与主要诊断,次要诊断列表和诊断相关组(DRG)进行比较。结果:MDS中列出了索赔诊断,主要诊断的平均频率为79%(范围:31%-94%),任何诊断的平均频率为66%(范围:33%-90%),71%(范围) :31%-94%)。 MDS诊断被列为主要诊断,所有诊断和DRG,其平均发生率分别为20%(范围:6%-81%),62%(范围:41%-86%)和19%(范围:7) %-84%),仅80%以上的时间出现髋部骨折。结论:对于大多数诊断,MDS列出近期住院诊断的敏感性。但是,除髋部骨折外,就先前住院的主要原因而言,MDS的预测价值较差;这可能对居民护理计划以及该数据库在长期护理研究中的实用性产生影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号