...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry >International epidemiology of child and adolescent psychopathology II: Integration and applications of dimensional findings from 44 societies
【24h】

International epidemiology of child and adolescent psychopathology II: Integration and applications of dimensional findings from 44 societies

机译:儿童和青少年心理病理学国际流行病学II:来自44个社会的维度发现的整合和应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective: To build on Achenbach, Rescorla, and Ivanova (2012) by (a) reporting new international findings for parent, teacher, and self-ratings on the Child Behavior Checklist, Youth Self-Report, and Teachers Report Form; (b) testing the fit of syndrome models to new data from 17 societies, including previously underrepresented regions; (c) testing effects of society, gender, and age in 44 societies by integrating new and previous data; (d) testing cross-society correlations between mean item ratings; (e) describing the construction of multisociety norms; (f) illustrating clinical applications. Method: Confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs) of parent, teacher, and self-ratings, performed separately for each society; tests of societal, gender, and age effects on dimensional syndrome scales, DSM-oriented scales, Internalizing, Externalizing, and Total Problems scales; tests of agreement between low, medium, and high ratings of problem items across societies. Results: CFAs supported the tested syndrome models in all societies according to the primary fit index (Root Mean Square Error of Approximation [RMSEA]), but less consistently according to other indices; effect sizes were small-to-medium for societal differences in scale scores, but very small for gender, age, and interactions with society; items received similarly low, medium, or high ratings in different societies; problem scores from 44 societies fit three sets of multisociety norms. Conclusions: Statistically derived syndrome models fit parent, teacher, and self-ratings when tested individually in all 44 societies according to RMSEAs (but less consistently according to other indices). Small to medium differences in scale scores among societies supported the use of low-, medium-, and high-scoring norms in clinical assessment of individual children.
机译:目的:通过以下方式建立在阿亨巴赫,雷斯科拉和伊凡诺娃(Achenbach,Rescorla和Ivanova,2012)的基础上:(a)在儿童行为清单,青少年自我报告和教师报告表上报告父母,老师和自我评价的国际最新发现; (b)测试综合症模型对来自17个社会(包括以前代表性不足的地区)的新数据的拟合度; (c)通过整合新的和以前的数据来检验44个社会中社会,性别和年龄的影响; (d)测试平均项目评分之间的跨社会相关性; (e)描述多元社会规范的建构; (f)说明临床应用。方法:针对每个社会分别进行的父母,老师和自我评估的确认性因子分析(CFAs);测试社会,性别和年龄对维度综合症量表,面向DSM的量表,内部化,外部化和总问题量表的影响;跨社会对问题项目的低,中和高评级之间的一致性测试。结果:CFA支持根据主要拟合指数(均方根均方根误差[RMSEA])在所有社会中测试的综合症模型,但根据其他指数的一致性较低;对于量表得分的社会差异,影响大小为中小型,而对于性别,年龄和与社会的互动而言,影响大小很小。在不同社会中获得相似,低,中或高评分的项目;来自44个社会的问题分数符合三组多社会准则。结论:当根据RMSEA在所有44个社会中分别进行测试时,从统计上得出的综合症模型可以拟合父母,老师和自我评估(但根据其他指标则不一致)。各个社会之间规模得分的中小差异支持对个别儿童进行临床评估时使用低,中和高得分规范。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号