...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry >Childhood anxiety disorders: parent-child (dis)agreement using a structured interview for the DSM-IV.
【24h】

Childhood anxiety disorders: parent-child (dis)agreement using a structured interview for the DSM-IV.

机译:儿童焦虑症:使用DSM-IV的结构化访谈进行的亲子(异议)协议。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate parent-child agreement for diagnosis of childhood anxiety disorders using a DSM-IV-based structured interview in an anxiety-clinic-referred sample and to explore the role of age and gender on agreement. METHOD: Forty-five children (ages 7-14 years) and their parents completed independent structured diagnostic interviews conducted by separate diagnosticians. Agreement between parent- and child-report on childhood anxiety disorder diagnoses was determined. RESULTS: Levels of parent-child agreement were poor for the major childhood anxiety disorders presenting either as principal diagnosis or presence anywhere in the clinical picture. No significant differences were found for age or gender. However, somewhat greater agreement was found in older children for the principal diagnosis of specific phobia, and in females for the principal diagnosis of social phobia. Agreement was found to be greater between parents and children when each reported at least one principal anxiety diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: When separate diagnosticians are used, there is limited agreement between parents and children for the DSM-IV anxiety disorders. Appropriately integrating the discrepant reports in reaching a diagnosis remains a methodological issue. Implications for treatment and future research are discussed.
机译:目的:使用基于DSM-IV的结构性访谈,在以焦虑症为参考的样本中评估亲子协议对儿童焦虑症的诊断,并探讨年龄和性别在协议中的作用。方法:四十五名儿童(7-14岁)和他们的父母完成了由独立诊断员进行的独立结构化诊断访谈。确定了父母和孩子之间关于儿童焦虑症诊断的报告的一致性。结果:对于主要的儿童焦虑症,无论是作为主要诊断还是在临床上任何地方都存在,亲子协议水平很差。没有发现年龄或性别的显着差异。然而,在较大的儿童中,对于特定的恐惧症的主要诊断与在女性中的社会性恐惧症的主要诊断,在某种程度上达成了更大的共识。当父母和孩子各自报告至少一项主要焦虑症诊断时,发现父母与孩子之间的协议更大。结论:当使用单独的诊断医生时,DSM-IV焦虑症的父母和孩子之间的共识有限。在诊断中适当整合差异报告仍然是方法论问题。讨论了对治疗和未来研究的意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号