首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Society of Hypertension : >A pilot study comparison of a new method for aortic pulse wave velocity measurements using transthoracic bioimpedance and thigh cuff oscillometry with the standard tonometric method
【24h】

A pilot study comparison of a new method for aortic pulse wave velocity measurements using transthoracic bioimpedance and thigh cuff oscillometry with the standard tonometric method

机译:通过胸腔生物阻抗和大腿袖带示波法与标准眼压法测量主动脉脉搏波速度的新方法的初步研究比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aortic pulse wave velocity (aPWV) can be measured with different methodologies, including applanation tonometry. These pilot study findings suggest that impedance cardiography combined with thigh oscillometry provides comparable results. Intra- and inter-observer variability was tested by two observers in two subjects. We instrumented 41 patients and 12 healthy normotensive controls for impedance cardiography and consecutive applanation tonometry and compared methods using the Bland-Altman method. Observer variability for the impedance-thigh cuff method (range, 3.61%-7.77%) was comparable with the tonometric method (range, 2.93%-7.37%). Comparison of the two methods based on the Bland-Altman plot revealed a good agreement between methods. The bias between impedance and tonometric measurements was -0.28 +/- 0.37 m/s. Both measurements were significantly correlated (r(2) = 0.94; P < .0001; slope = 1.038),Impedance cardiography combined with thigh oscillometry is an easy to use approach which, in addition to providing hemodynamic information, yields aPWV measurements comparable to applanation tonometry. Following full validation according to current guidelines, the methodology could prove useful in cardiovascular risk stratification. (C) 2015 American Society of Hypertension. All rights reserved.
机译:主动脉脉搏波速度(aPWV)可以采用不同的方法进行测量,包括压平眼压计。这些初步研究结果表明,阻抗心动图结合大腿示波法可提供可比的结果。观察者之间和观察者之间的变异性由两名受试者的两名观察员测试。我们对41例患者和12个健康的血压正常对照者进行了阻抗心动图检查和连续压平眼压测量,并比较了使用Bland-Altman方法的方法。阻抗-大腿套囊法的观察者变异性(范围3.61%-7.77%)与眼压法的观察者变异性(范围2.93%-7.37%)相当。比较两种基于Bland-Altman图的方法,发现方法之间有很好的一致性。阻抗和眼压测量之间的偏差为-0.28 +/- 0.37 m / s。两种测量值均显着相关(r(2)= 0.94; P <.0001;斜率= 1.038),阻抗心动图结合大腿示波法是一种易于使用的方法,除了提供血液动力学信息外,还可以产生与压平法相当的aPWV测量值眼压计。根据当前指南进行全面验证后,该方法可证明对心血管风险分层有用。 (C)2015年美国高血压学会。版权所有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号