首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography: official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography >Quantification of mitral regurgitation by general imaging three-dimensional quantification: Feasibility and accuracy
【24h】

Quantification of mitral regurgitation by general imaging three-dimensional quantification: Feasibility and accuracy

机译:通过常规成像三维量化对二尖瓣关闭不全进行量化:可行性和准确性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Mitral regurgitant volume (MRvol) is an important index of the severity of mitral regurgitation (MR), but MRvol measurement remains challenging. With the development of probe technology and software, General Imaging 3D Quantification (GI 3DQ) allows the direct measurement of MR jet volume. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of MRvol by quantification of MR jet volume using GI 3DQ. Methods Ninety-three patients were included, 61 with functional MR and 32 with mitral valve prolapse. Patients with MR were also divided into those with central MR (n = 41) and those with eccentric MR (n = 52). MRvol was assessed using GI 3DQ and the proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method. MRvol using effective regurgitant orifice area by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography multiplied by the MR time-velocity integral was used as the reference method. Results MRvol measured by GI 3DQ and the PISA method had good correlation with MRvol by the reference method. A significant underestimation of MRvol using GI 3DQ and the PISA method was observed in the assessment of eccentric MR, but without a significant difference in the assessment of central MR. Conclusions Quantification of MRvol with GI 3DQ was feasible. Quantification of central MRvol using this methodology is accurate compared with the reference method. Quantification of MRvol with GI 3DQ has no significant difference from the currently recommended PISA method.
机译:背景二尖瓣反流体积(MRvol)是二尖瓣反流(MR)严重程度的重要指标,但MRvol测量仍然具有挑战性。随着探头技术和软件的发展,通用成像3D定量(GI 3DQ)可以直接测量MR喷射量。这项研究的目的是通过使用GI 3DQ量化MR喷射量来评估MRvol的可行性和准确性。方法纳入93例患者,其中功能性MR为61例,二尖瓣脱垂为32例。 MR患者也分为中心性MR(n = 41)和偏心性MR(n = 52)。使用GI 3DQ和近端等速表面积(PISA)方法评估MRvol。使用通过实时三维超声心动图有效返流孔面积乘以MR时间-速度积分的MRvol作为参考方法。结果GI 3DQ和PISA方法测得的MRvol与参考方法的MRvol具有良好的相关性。在偏心MR的评估中,观察到使用GI 3DQ和PISA方法对MRvol的明显低估,但在中央MR的评估中没有显着差异。结论用GI 3DQ定量MRvol是可行的。与参考方法相比,使用这种方法对中央MRvol进行定量是准确的。使用GI 3DQ定量MRvol与目前推荐的PISA方法没有显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号