首页> 外文期刊>Clinical drug investigation >Long-term efficacy and safety of ipratropium bromide plus fenoterol via respimat~r soft mist~(?) inhaler (smi) versus a pressurised metered-dose inhaler in asthma
【24h】

Long-term efficacy and safety of ipratropium bromide plus fenoterol via respimat~r soft mist~(?) inhaler (smi) versus a pressurised metered-dose inhaler in asthma

机译:哮喘患者使用柔雾雾化吸入器(smi)与加压定量吸入器相比,异丙托溴铵联合非诺特罗的长期疗效和安全性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: Respimat~R Soft Mist~(?) Inhaler (SMI) is a novel, propellant-free device that significantly increases lung deposition compared with pressurised metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ipratropium bromide/fenoterol hydrobromide (IB/FEN; Berodual~R) delivered via Respimat~R SMI and via a chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-driven pMDI (CFC-MDI) in patients with asthma.Design: Multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.Patients: 631 patients (18-65 years old) with stable asthma. Interventions: After a 2-week run-in period (IB/FEN 20mug/50mug via CFC-MDI, two actuations four times a day), patients were randomised to 12 weeks' treatment with one of five treatments: IB/FEN 10mug/25mug, 20mug/50mug or placebo via Respimat~R SMI (one actuation four times a day), or IB/FEN 20mug/50mug or placebo via CFC-MDI (two actuations four times a day). The main efficacy measure was lung function (assessed on days 1, 29, 57 and 85); safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events.Results: Bronchodilator responses to IB/FEN were much greater than those to placebo (mean peak increases in forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV_1] on day 85: 0.498-0.521L, active treatment; 0.215 and 0.240L, placebo). According to the primary endpoint, i.e. the average change in FEV_1 from test-day baseline over the 6 hours after dosing on day 85, neither IB/FEN dosage via Respimat~R SMI was inferior to IB/FEN via pMDI (p < 0.001). Non-inferiority of the two Respimat~R SMI dosages was supported by analyses of other lung function measures, e.g. average change in FEV_1 from test-day baseline over the 6 hours after dosing on the other 3 test days, and peak FEV_1 on all test days. Overall, the safety profile of IB/FEN via Respimat? SMI was comparable to that via CFC-MDI.Conclusion: IB/FEN from Respimat~R SMI is as effective and safe as from CFC-MDI and enables a 2- to 4-fold daily dose reduction of IB/FEN.
机译:目的:Respimat〜R软雾吸入器(SMI)是一种新型的无推进剂装置,与加压定量吸入器(pMDIs)相比,可显着增加肺部沉积。这项研究的目的是比较通过Respimat®R SMI和通过氯氟烃(CFC)驱动的pMDI(CFC-MDI)递送的异丙托溴铵/非诺特罗氢溴酸盐(IB / FEN; Berodual〜R)的疗效和安全性设计:多中心,随机,双盲,安慰剂对照,平行组研究患者:631例稳定哮喘的患者(18-65岁)。干预:经过2周的磨合期(通过CFC-MDI进行IB / FEN 20mug / 50mug,一天两次四次促动),将患者随机分为12个星期的治疗,采用以下五种治疗方法之一:IB / FEN 10mug / 25杯,20杯/ 50杯或安慰剂通过Respimat〜R SMI(一天四次促动),或IB / FEN 20杯/ 50杯或安慰剂通过CFC-MDI(一天四次促动两次)。主要功效指标是肺功能(在第1、29、57和85天进行评估)。结果:支气管扩张剂对IB / FEN的反应远大于对安慰剂的反应(第85天,第1天[FEV_1]的最大呼气量峰值高峰:0.498-0.521L,积极治疗; 0.215)和0.240升安慰剂)。根据主要终点,即在第85天给药后6个小时内测试日基线FEV_1的平均变化,Respimat〜R SMI的IB / FEN剂量均不逊于pMDI的IB / FEN(p <0.001) 。两种Respimat〜R SMI剂量的非劣效性通过分析其他肺功能指标(例如在其他3个测试日服药后的6小时内,FEV_1与测试日基线相比的平均变化,而在所有测试日均达到FEV_1峰值。总体而言,通过Respimat IB / FEN的安全性如何?结论:Respimat〜R SMI的IB / FEN与CFC-MDI一样有效,安全,可使IB / FEN的日剂量减少2至4倍。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号