首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Dietetic Association >Nutrition Practice Guidelines for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus positively affect dietitian practices and patient outcomes. The Diabetes Care and Education Dietetic Practice Group.
【24h】

Nutrition Practice Guidelines for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus positively affect dietitian practices and patient outcomes. The Diabetes Care and Education Dietetic Practice Group.

机译:1型糖尿病的营养实践指南对营养师的实践和患者预后产生积极影响。糖尿病护理和教育饮食实践小组。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: Assess the acceptance and ease of use of Nutrition Practice Guidelines for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus by dietitians in a variety of settings; determine if nutrition care activities of dietitians change when practice guidelines are available; measure changes in patient control of blood glucose level, measured as glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c); compare patient satisfaction with care and perceptions about quality of life. DESIGN: Using the approach of outcomes research, volunteer dietitians were recruited and assigned randomly to a usual care group or a practice guidelines group. Patients with type 1 diabetes were enrolled by dietitians and followed up for a 3-month period. Outcome measures included dietitian care activities, changes in patient HbA1c levels, and patient satisfaction and perceptions about quality of life. SUBJECTS/SETTINGS: Dietitians from across the United States who responded to a recruitment notice participated. Their work settings included diabetes referral centers, endocrinology clinics, primary care and community health clinics, hospitals, and a worksite clinic. They recruited patients from their setting for the study. Outcome data were available from dietitians providing care to 24 patients using the new practice guidelines and dietitians providing care to 30 patients using more traditional methods. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: chi 2 Test, t test, and analysis of covariance. RESULTS: Dietitians in the practice guidelines group spent 63% more time with patients and were more likely to do an assessment and discuss results with patients than dietitians in the usual care group. Practice guidelines dietitians paid greater attention to glycemic control goals. Levels of HbA1c improved at 3 months in 21 (88%) of practice guidelines patients compared with 16 (53%) of usual care patients. Practice guidelines patients achieved greater reductions in HbA1c level than usual care patients (-1.00 vs -0.33). This difference was statistically significant and clinically meaningful. CONCLUSIONS/APPLICATIONS: Dietitians responded positively to practice guidelines for type 1 diabetes. Use of guidelines resulted in changes in dietitian practices and produced greater improvements in patient blood glucose outcomes at 3 months compared with usual care. Practice guidelines did not significantly influence patient satisfaction with care of perceived quality of life.
机译:目的:评估营养师在各种环境中对1型糖尿病的营养实践准则的接受程度和易用性;确定在有实践指南时营养师的营养保健活动是否发生变化;测量患者控制血糖水平的变化,以糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)表示;将患者满意度与护理和对生活质量的看法进行比较。设计:采用结果研究的方法,招募自愿营养师并将其随机分配到常规护理组或实践指南组。营养师招募了1型糖尿病患者,并进行了3个月的随访。结果指标包括营养师护理活动,患者HbA1c水平的变化以及患者满意度和对生活质量的看法。受试者/地点:响应招聘通知的全美营养师参加了会议。他们的工作场所包括糖尿病转诊中心,内分泌诊所,初级保健和社区卫生诊所,医院以及工作场所诊所。他们从研究环境中招募了患者。营养学家可使用新的实践指南从结果中获得对24名患者的护理的结果数据,而营养学家则可使用更传统的方法为30名患者提供护理的结果数据。统计分析:χ2检验,t检验和协方差分析。结果:与常规护理组中的营养师相比,实践指南组中的营养师与患者在一起的时间增加了63%,并且更有可能与患者进行评估和讨论结果。营养师的实践指南营养师更加关注血糖控制目标。在21个月的实践指南患者中,HbA1c的水平在3个月时有所改善(88%),而在常规护理患者中为16例(53%)。实践指南中,患者的HbA1c水平降低程度比常规护理患者更高(-1.00对-0.33)。这种差异具有统计学意义,并且在临床上具有意义。结论/应用:营养师对1型糖尿病的实践指南反应积极。与常规护理相比,使用指南导致营养师做法发生变化,并且在3个月时患者的血糖结果得到了更大的改善。实践准则并没有显着影响患者对生活质量的满意度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号