首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Surgeons >Measuring safety and efficiency in the operating room: Development and validation of a metric for evaluating task execution in the operating room
【24h】

Measuring safety and efficiency in the operating room: Development and validation of a metric for evaluating task execution in the operating room

机译:测量手术室的安全性和效率:开发和验证用于评估手术室中任务执行情况的度量标准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Although a number of validated tools are available for assessing nontechnical skills and teamwork in the operating room (OR), there are no tools for measuring completion of key OR tasks, which is fundamental to effective teamwork, patient safety, and OR efficiency. This study describes the development and content validation of a new tool (ie, the Metric for Evaluating Task Execution in the Operating Room) for measuring basic task completion during surgical procedures. Study Design: The content validity of 106 OR tasks was assessed using 50 real-time observations of general surgical procedures, followed by a process of expert consensus. A panel of 15 OR experts (ie, surgeons, anesthesiologists, and OR nurses) were asked to rate all tasks observed in <70% of procedures for relevance to patient safety and OR efficiency (using scientifically accepted definitions). Tasks rated highly were retained. Those perceived less relevant were removed. A second panel of patient-safety experts refined the tool to remove duplication, ensure usability, and include novel tasks. Results: Twenty-four of the original 106 tasks were observed in <70% of cases. Seven of these were rated highly by the OR experts for relevance to patient safety and efficiency and were retained in the Metric for Evaluating Task Execution in the Operating Room. Of the remaining 17, four were retained and 13 were removed by the patient-safety experts. In the final revision phase, an additional 23 tasks were removed and 10 new tasks added. The final tool consists of 80 OR tasks relating to well-established processes of care. Conclusions: The Metric for Evaluating Task Execution in the Operating Room is easy to use and can identify specific gaps in safety and/or efficiency in OR processes. Next, we should examine its links with additional measures of OR performance, for example, patient outcomes, list cancellations/delays, and nontechnical skills. ? 2013 by the American College of Surgeons.
机译:背景:尽管有许多经过验证的工具可用于评估手术室(OR)中的非技术技能和团队合作能力,但尚无用于衡量关键OR任务完成情况的工具,这对于有效的团队合作,患者安全和OR效率至关重要。这项研究描述了一种新工具的开发和内容验证,该新工具(用于评估手术室中任务执行的指标)用于测量外科手术过程中基本任务的完成情况。研究设计:使用50例常规手术实时观察结果,然后经过专家共识,评估了106例任务的内容有效性。要求由15位手术室专家(即外科医生,麻醉师和手术室护士)组成的小组对在<70%的程序中观察到的所有任务进行评分,以评估其与患者安全性和手术室效率之间的关系(使用科学上公认的定义)。高度评价的任务得以保留。那些不那么相关的人被删除了。第二个患者安全专家小组改进了该工具,以消除重复,确保可用性并包括新任务。结果:在少于70%的案例中,观察到了最初106项任务中的24项。其中有7项被OR专家评为与患者安全和效率相关的高度评价,并保留在手术室评估任务执行的指标中。在其余的17个中,病人安全专家保留了4个,将13个删除了。在最后的修订阶段,又删除了23个任务,并添加了10个新任务。最终工具包括与完善的护理流程相关的80项OR任务。结论:评估手术室中任务执行的度量标准易于使用,并且可以确定OR流程中安全性和/或效率方面的特定差距。接下来,我们应该检查其与OR表现的其他度量之间的联系,例如,患者结果,清单取消/延误以及非技术技能。 ? 2013年由美国外科医生学院提供。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号