首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Surgeons >Age-stratified results from 20,095 aortoiliac aneurysm repairs: Should we approach octogenarians and nonagenarians differently?
【24h】

Age-stratified results from 20,095 aortoiliac aneurysm repairs: Should we approach octogenarians and nonagenarians differently?

机译:20,095例主动脉瘤修复的年龄分层结果:我们应该以不同的方式对待高龄者和非老年人吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: In the endovascular era, elderly patients are offered repair of their aortoiliac aneurysms (AAA) more frequently than in the past. Our objective is to compare age groups and draw inferences for AAA repair outcomes. Study Design: We identified 20,095 patients who underwent AAA repair between 2005 and 2010 using the American College of Surgeons NSQIP national database. Preoperative characteristics and outcomes were compared among age groups (group A: 0 to 64 years; B: 65 to 79 years; C: 80 to 89 years; and D: 90 years and older). Results: The age distribution of the cohort was A: 17.1%, B: 57.2%, C: 24%, and D: 1.7%. Nonagenarians presented significantly more often as emergencies in comparison with groups A to C (A: 13.8%, B: 10.8%, C: 12.9%, D: 22.1%; p < 0.001). Endovascular aneurysm repair was performed more frequently in older patients (A: 55.2%, B: 63.7%, C: 74.6%, D: 77.9%; p < 0.001). Risk of any complication was significantly different among groups, becoming more prevalent with advanced age (A: 22.8%, B: 23.4%, C: 24.7%, D: 27.8%; p = 0.041). Nonsurgical complications (A: 14.7%, B: 16.4%, C: 18%, D: 19.8%; p < 0.001) and cardiovascular complications (A: 3.9%, B: 4.5%, C: 5.5%, D: 5.2%; p = 0.003) were also higher with advanced age. Overall mortality was 3.1%, 4.9%,7.2%, and 13.2% for groups A to D, respectively (p < 0.001). Mortality after elective AAA repair was significantly higher for open surgery compared with endovascular aneurysm repair in all age groups (open surgery vs endovascular aneurysm repair, A:1.9% vs 0.5%; p = 0.001; B: 3.9% vs 1.2%; p < 0.001; C: 7.4% vs 2%; p < 0.001; D: 18.8% vs 3.8%; p = 0.004). After adjusting for confounders in the entire cohort, advanced age persisted as an independent factor for postoperative mortality with a higher risk of death of 1.8 (95% CI, 1.3-2.5), 2.7 (95% CI, 1.9-3.8), and 3.3 (95% CI, 1.8-6.1) times for groups B, C, and D, respectively (group A reference). Conclusions: Advanced age is independently associated with higher risk of death after AAA repair and indication for surgery should be adjusted for different age groups accordingly. Endovascular aneurysm repair should be preferred for octogenarians and nonagenarians with indication to undergo repair of their AAA.
机译:背景:在血管内时代,老年患者比过去更常接受主动脉瘤(AAA)的修复。我们的目标是比较年龄组并得出AAA修复结果的推论。研究设计:我们使用美国外科医生学院NSQIP国家数据库鉴定了2005年至2010年间进行AAA修复的20,095名患者。比较年龄组之间的术前特征和结局(A组:0至64岁; B:65至79岁; C:80至89岁; D:90岁以上)。结果:该队列的年龄分布为A:17.1%,B:57.2%,C:24%,D:1.7%。与A至C组相比,非精疲力竭的人出现紧急情况的频率更高(A:13.8%,B:10.8%,C:12.9%,D:22.1%; p <0.001)。老年患者更常进行血管内动脉瘤修复(A:55.2%,B:63.7%,C:74.6%,D:77.9%; p <0.001)。各组之间发生并发症的风险显着不同,随着年龄的增长而变得更加普遍(A:22.8%,B:23.4%,C:24.7%,D:27.8%; p = 0.041)。非手术并发症(A:14.7%,B:16.4%,C:18%,D:19.8%; p <0.001)和心血管并发症(A:3.9%,B:4.5%,C:5.5%,D:5.2% ; p = 0.003)随年龄增长也更高。 A至D组的总死亡率分别为3.1%,4.9%,7.2%和13.2%(p <0.001)。与所有年龄组的血管内动脉瘤修复相比,开放手术择期AAA修复后的死亡率显着更高(开放手术vs血管内动脉瘤修复,A:1.9%vs 0.5%; p = 0.001; B:3.9%vs 1.2%; p < 0.001; C:7.4%对比2%; p <0.001; D:18.8%对比3.8%; p = 0.004)。在对整个队列中的混杂因素进行调整后,高龄仍然是术后死亡率的独立因素,死亡风险较高,分别为1.8(95%CI,1.3-2.5),2.7(95%CI,1.9-3.8)和3.3。 B,C和D组(参考A组)分别(95%CI,1.8-6.1)倍。结论:高龄与AAA修复后较高的死亡风险独立相关,应根据不同年龄组调整手术适应症。对于八岁以上的人和非老年期的人,应首选进行血管内动脉瘤修复,并应对其AAA进行修复。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号