【24h】

Reply

机译:回复

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We appreciate Dr Misery's letter and comments. The point about the role of damage control in critically injured patients is well taken. Damage control was indeed performed with packing of the abdomen and temporary abdominal wall closure. Reconstruction of the pancreas and common bile duct at this stage is a judgment call, and there are advantages and disadvantages to delayed reconstruction. I personally prefer to do the reconstruction at the acute stage, if it can be done expeditiously. The pancreatic anastomosis becomes much more difficult 24 to 48 hours after the initial operation because of excessive edema, necrosis, and fragile tissues. Also,'I prefer to establish continuity of the bowel in all patients with damage control, because stapling off of the bowel results in complete obstruction, dilation, and aggravation of the already compromised blood supply. We have seen proximal bowel necrosis of the small bowel after distal stapling.
机译:我们赞赏苦难博士的来信和评论。关于伤害控制在重症患者中的作用的观点已被很好地理解。确实是通过收紧腹部和暂时关闭腹壁来进行损伤控制。在这一阶段,胰腺和胆总管的重建是一个判断因素,延迟重建有其优点和缺点。如果可以迅速进行,我个人更喜欢在紧急阶段进行重建。由于过多的水肿,坏死和脆弱的组织,胰吻合术在初次手术后24至48小时变得更加困难。而且,我更愿意在所有有损害控制的患者中建立肠管的连续性,因为吻合肠管会完全阻塞,扩张和加重已经受损的血液供应。我们已经看到远端吻合术后小肠近端肠坏死。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号