首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Cardiology >Long-term comparison of drug-eluting stents and coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary revascularization: 5-year outcomes from the Asan Medical Center-Multivessel Revascularization Registry.
【24h】

Long-term comparison of drug-eluting stents and coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary revascularization: 5-year outcomes from the Asan Medical Center-Multivessel Revascularization Registry.

机译:药物洗脱支架和冠状动脉搭桥术在多支冠状动脉血运重建中的长期比较:来自Asan医学中心-多支血管血运重建注册中心的5年结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: We performed the long-term (5-year) follow-up of a large cohort of patients who underwent drug-eluting stent (DES) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery for multivessel revascularization. BACKGROUND: Limited information is available on very long-term outcomes after multivessel DES treatment relative to CABG. METHODS: We evaluated 3,042 patients with multivessel disease who received DES (n = 1,547) or underwent CABG (n = 1,495) between January 2003 and December 2005, and for whom complete follow-up data were available for a median 5.6 years (interquartile range: 4.6 to 6.3 years). We compared adverse outcomes (death; a composite outcome of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke; and repeat revascularization). RESULTS: After adjustment for differences in baseline risk factors, 5-year risk of death (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.00; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76 to 1.32, p = 0.99) and the combined risk of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.76 to 1.24, p = 0.81) were similar between the DES group and the CABG group. However, the rates of revascularization were significantly higher in the DES group (HR: 2.93; 95% CI: 2.20 to 3.90, p < 0.001). Similar results were obtained in comparisons of DES with CABG for high-risk clinical and anatomic subgroups with diabetes mellitus, abnormal ventricular function, age 65 years or more, and 3-vessel and left main disease. However, mortality benefit with DES implantation relative to CABG was noted in patients with 2-vessel disease (HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.36 to 0.92, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with multivessel disease, DES treatment, compared with CABG, showed similar rates of mortality and of the composite safety outcomes, but higher rates of revascularization up to 5 years.
机译:目的:我们对接受药物洗脱支架(DES)或冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)手术进行多支血管重建的一大批患者进行了长期(5年)随访。背景:相对于CABG,在多支血管DES治疗后,关于非常长期结果的信息有限。方法:我们评估了2003年1月至2005年12月间接受DES(n = 1547)或接受CABG(n = 1495)的3042例多支血管疾病患者,他们的中位随访时间为5.6年(四分位数范围) :4.6至6.3年)。我们比较了不良结局(死亡;死亡,心肌梗塞或中风的综合结局;重复血运重建)。结果:在校正了基线风险因素的差异,5年死亡风险后(危险比[HR]:1.00; 95%置信区间[CI]:0.76至1.32,p = 0.99)以及合并死亡的风险,心肌DES组和CABG组之间的梗塞或中风(HR:0.97; 95%CI:0.76至1.24,p = 0.81)相似。但是,DES组的血运重建率明显更高(HR:2.93; 95%CI:2.20至3.90,p <0.001)。将DES和CABG用于糖尿病,心室功能异常,65岁或以上,三支血管和左主干疾病的高风险临床和解剖亚组的比较,获得了相似的结果。然而,在2支血管疾病患者中,相对于CABG,使用DES植入可提高死亡率(HR:0.57; 95%CI:0.36至0.92,p = 0.02)。结论:对于多支血管疾病患者,DES治疗与CABG相比,死亡率和复合安全性结果相似,但在5年内血运重建率更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号