...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American College of Cardiology >Implantable defibrillator event rates in patients with unexplained syncope and inducible sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias: a comparison with patients known to have sustained ventricular tachycardia.
【24h】

Implantable defibrillator event rates in patients with unexplained syncope and inducible sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias: a comparison with patients known to have sustained ventricular tachycardia.

机译:原因不明的晕厥和可诱发的持续性室性心律失常的患者的植入式除颤器事件发生率:与已知的持续性室性心动过速患者的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical significance of inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias among patients with unexplained syncope. BACKGROUND: Induction of sustained ventricular arrhythmias at electrophysiology study in patients with unexplained syncope and structural heart disease is usually assigned diagnostic significance. However, the true frequency of subsequent spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias in the absence of antiarrhythmic medications is unknown. METHODS: In a retrospective case-control study, the incidence of implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) therapies for sustained ventricular arrhythmias among patients with unexplained syncope or near syncope (syncope group, n = 22) was compared with that of a control group of patients (n = 32) with clinically documented sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). Sustained ventricular arrhythmias were inducible in both groups and neither group received antiarrhythmic medications. All ICDs had stored electrograms or RR intervals. Clinical variables were similar between groups except that congestive cardiac failure was more common in the syncope group. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier analysis of the time to first appropriate ICD therapy for syncope and control groups produced overlapping curves (p = 0.9), with 57 +/- 11% and 50 +/- 9%, respectively, receiving ICD therapy by one year. In both groups, the induced arrhythmia was significantly faster than spontaneous arrhythmias, but the cycle lengths of induced and spontaneous arrhythmias were positively correlated (R = 0.6, p < 0.0001). During follow-up, three cardiac transplantations and seven deaths occurred in the syncope group, and two transplantations and five deaths occurred in the control group (36-month survival without transplant 52 +/- 11% and 83 +/- 7%, respectively, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with unexplained syncope, structural heart disease and inducible sustained ventricular arrhythmias, spontaneous sustained ventricular arrhythmias occur commonly and at a similar rate to patients with documented sustained VT. Thus, electrophysiologic testing in unexplained syncope can identify those at risk of potentially life-threatening tachyarrhythmias, and aggressive treatment of these patients is warranted.
机译:目的:评估原因不明的晕厥患者可诱发的室性快速性心律失常的临床意义。背景:无法解释的晕厥和结构性心脏病的患者在电生理研究中诱发持续性室性心律失常通常具有诊断意义。然而,在不使用抗心律不齐药物的情况下,随后的自发性室性心律失常的真实频率尚不清楚。方法:在一项回顾性病例对照研究中,比较了原因不明的晕厥或近晕厥患者(晕厥组,n = 22)与持续性室性心律失常的植入式心脏除颤器(ICD)治疗的发生率,与对照组的发生率进行了比较。 (n = 32),并有临床记录的持续性室性心动过速(VT)。两组均可诱发持续性心律失常,两组均未接受抗心律失常药物治疗。所有ICD都存储了电描记图或RR间隔。除充血性心力衰竭在晕厥组更常见外,各组间的临床变量相似。结果:Kaplan-Meier分析晕厥和对照组首次接受适当ICD治疗的时间产生重叠曲线(p = 0.9),其中接受ICD治疗的患者分别有57 +/- 11%和50 +/- 9%年。在两组中,诱发的心律失常均明显快于自发性心律失常,但诱发和自发性心律不齐的周期长度呈正相关(R = 0.6,p <0.0001)。在随访期间,晕厥组发生了3例心脏移植手术,其中7例死亡,而对照组则发生了2例移植手术,其中5例死亡(不进行移植的36个月生存率分别为52 +/- 11%和83 +/- 7%)。 ,p = 0.03)。结论:在原因不明的晕厥,结构性心脏病和可诱发的持续性室性心律失常的患者中,自发性持续性室性心律失常的发生率与发生持续性室速的患者相似。因此,在无法解释的晕厥中进行电生理检查可以识别出那些有可能危及生命的快速性心律失常的风险,因此有必要积极治疗这些患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号