...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine: JABFM >A comparison of cesarean delivery outcomes for rural family physicians and obstetricians
【24h】

A comparison of cesarean delivery outcomes for rural family physicians and obstetricians

机译:农村家庭医生和妇产科医生剖宫产结果的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Despite declining access to obstetrical care in many regions, family physicians often have difficulty obtaining Cesarean delivery privileges. We compared outcomes of Cesarean deliveries performed by family physicians (FPs) and obstetricians (OBs). The last such study done was more than 15 years ago. Methods: This study was a chart review of 250 consecutive Cesarean deliveries was done at 2 rural New England hospitals. At one hospital, Cesarean deliveries were performed by FPs; at the other they were done by OBs. Demographics, pregnancy risk factors, and maternal and neonatal complication rates at each site were compared. Results: Demographics, indications for Cesarean delivery, and prenatal risk factors were comparable at both sites except there were more hypertensive patients at the FP site. There were no differences in intraoperative or infectious complications. There were fewer postoperative complications at the FP hospital, which were mostly attributable to fewer blood transfusions and readmissions. There were no differences in neonatal outcomes, although there were more deliveries of fetuses >38 weeks' gestation at the FP site. Conclusions: Patients did not face increased risk when Cesarean deliveries were performed by FPs rather than OBs. A larger, more geographically diverse study is needed to confirm these findings. Results could support FPs seeking privileges to perform Cesarean deliveries, thus expanding access to care for pregnant women. (J Am Board Fam Med 2013;26:366 -372.).
机译:尽管在许多地区,产科护理的机会有所下降,但家庭医生通常难以获得剖宫产的特权。我们比较了家庭医生(FPs)和妇产科医生(OBs)进行剖宫产的结果。上一次此类研究是在15年前。方法:本研究是对新英格兰2所农村医院连续250例剖宫产的图表回顾。在一家医院中,剖宫产是由FP进行的。另外,它们是由OB完成的。比较了每个站点的人口统计学,妊娠危险因素以及孕产妇和新生儿并发症的发生率。结果:人口统计学,剖宫产指征和产前危险因素在两个地点均相若,只是在FP地点有更多的高血压患者。术中或感染并发症无差异。 FP医院的术后并发症较少,这主要是由于输血和再入院较少。新生儿结局无差异,尽管在FP部位有更多的胎儿分娩> 38周。结论:通过FP而不是OB进行剖宫产时,患者的风险不会增加。需要更大范围,更地理上不同的研究来确认这些发现。结果可以支持寻求特权进行分娩剖宫产的FP,从而扩大孕妇的就诊机会。 (J Am Board Fam Med 2013; 26:366 -372。)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号