首页> 外文学位 >Evaluation of current thrombophilia screening practices of internists, family physicians, and obstetricians/gynecologists: Factor V Leiden genetic testing and referral patterns.
【24h】

Evaluation of current thrombophilia screening practices of internists, family physicians, and obstetricians/gynecologists: Factor V Leiden genetic testing and referral patterns.

机译:对内科医生,家庭医生和妇产科医生的当前血栓形成筛查实践的评估:因子V莱顿基因测试和转诊模式。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Thrombophilia is a complex, multifactorial condition in which the patient exhibits an increased susceptibility to form blood clots, especially in the veins of the lower extremities. A mutation in the gene encoding for factor V, known as factor V Leiden (FVL), is the most common cause of inherited thrombophilia, and contributes to thrombotic events by altering the quantity or function of coagulation proteins. Professional organizations, such as the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) and the College of American Pathologists (CAP), have published recommendations including criteria for the optimal individuals to test for factor V Leiden by mutation analysis. Multiple studies have shown inconsistencies in the ability of physicians to adequately order, interpret, and explain genetic tests. The goals of this research are to evaluate if physicians are ordering FVL tests for appropriate clinical scenarios, and if these physicians are referring patients to genetic counseling for similar situations. A total of 45 surveys, 30 obstetricians and gynecologists and 15 internal medicine and family practitioners, were returned and completed by physicians practicing in South Carolina. Overall, obstetricians and gynecologists were more confident than internal medicine and family practitioners with regards to aspects surrounding FVL testing. Both physician groups reported similar likelihoods with regards to all clinical scenarios. There was more variation between the two groups of physicians with regards to potential barriers that prevent the integration of FVL genetic testing into clinical practice. We found that our hypotheses were not supported by the data obtained in this study. Instead, responses were generally consistent between obstetricians and gynecologists and internal medicine and family physicians, therefore showing little difference amongst the two groups. Overall, physicians did not feel that referral to genetic counseling was often indicated. The most often cited need for referral to genetic counseling was when patient scenarios included a personal medical history or family history of venous thrombosis.
机译:血栓形成是一种复杂的多因素病状,其中患者表现出形成血块的敏感性增加,尤其是在下肢的静脉中。编码因子V的基因中的突变,称为因子V莱顿(FVL),是遗传性血友病的最常见原因,并通过改变凝血蛋白的数量或功能而促成血栓事件。专业组织,例如美国医学遗传学学院(ACMG)和美国病理学家学院(CAP),已经发布了建议,其中包括通过突变分析测试V莱顿因子的最佳个体的标准。多项研究表明,医生对基因检测进行适当排序,解释和解释的能力不一致。这项研究的目的是评估医师是否针对适当的临床情况订购了FVL测试,以及这些医师是否针对类似情况将患者转介至基因咨询。由在南卡罗来纳州执业的医师返回并完成了总共45项调查,30名妇产科医生和15名内科及家庭医生。总体而言,就FVL测试方面而言,妇产科医生和妇科医生比内科医师和家庭医生更有信心。两组医师均报告了所有临床情况的相似可能性。两组医生在阻止FVL基因检测整合到临床实践中的潜在障碍方面存在更多差异。我们发现我们的假设不受本研究获得的数据的支持。相反,妇产科医生,内科医师和家庭医师之间的反应通常是一致的,因此两组之间的差异很小。总体而言,医生并不认为经常需要转诊遗传咨询。引用遗传咨询最常被引用的需求是患者的情况包括个人病史或静脉血栓形成家族史。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lenarcic, Stacy Hall.;

  • 作者单位

    University of South Carolina.;

  • 授予单位 University of South Carolina.;
  • 学科 Biology Genetics.Health Sciences Health Care Management.Health Sciences Medicine and Surgery.
  • 学位 M.S.
  • 年度 2010
  • 页码 67 p.
  • 总页数 67
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:36:45

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号