首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Stored Products Research >Efficacy of metal silos and hermetic bags against stored-maize insect pests under simulated smallholder farmer conditions
【24h】

Efficacy of metal silos and hermetic bags against stored-maize insect pests under simulated smallholder farmer conditions

机译:模拟小农户条件下金属筒仓和密闭袋对玉米储藏害虫的功效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Pesticide-free hermetic grain storage is an environmentally-benign alternative to synthetic pesticides, currently being used in many countries. However, in some African countries knowledge gaps exist on the effectiveness of hermetic maize storage, particularly where the Larger Grain Borer (LGB), Prostephanus truncatus occurs. Trials simulating African smallholder farmer conditions were conducted at two sites in contrasting agro-ecological zones in Zimbabwe for up to 12 months during the 2013/14 storage season. There were two hermetic treatments: metal silos and hermetic bags; and two non-hermetic treatments: a registered synthetic pesticide and untreated control, in polypropylene bags. Two modes of infestation: natural and combined (natural plus artificial) were used as factors. Treatments were arranged in a completely randomised design and stored in ordinary rooms. Hermetic treatments were significantly superior (P 0.001) to non-hermetic treatments in preserving germination, controlling insect population development, suppressing maize grain damage, controlling grain dust production and consequently limiting weight loss during storage. Hermetic bags were more effective than non-hermetic treatments in reducing storage losses despite the plastic liners having multiple insect-induced perforations of more than 300 holes per plastic liner at termination. However, there were no significant differences between metal silos and hermetic bags regardless of the mode of infestation. There was strong correlation between total insect population per kg and: percentage grain damage, percentage weight loss, and grain dust which indicate the importance of controlling insect pest development during storage to reduce losses. Results show that hermetic storage can be an effective pesticide-free alternative to synthetic pesticides in reducing grain storage losses under smallholder farming conditions, even where LGB occurs. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:无农药的气密谷物存储是目前在许多国家/地区使用的合成农药的无害环境替代品。但是,在一些非洲国家,关于密闭玉米储存的有效性存在知识差距,尤其是在发生较大谷Bor(LGB)时,就存在截肢前脚Pro(Prostephanus truncatus)。在2013/14储藏季节期间,在津巴布韦形成鲜明对比的农业生态区的两个地点进行了模拟非洲小农户状况的试验,长达12个月。有两种密封处理:金属筒仓和密封袋;两种非密封处理:在聚丙烯袋中注册的合成农药和未经处理的对照。影响因素有两种:自然和自然(自然加人工)。治疗安排在完全随机的设计中,并保存在普通房间中。密封处理在保持发芽,控制昆虫种群发育,抑制玉米籽粒破坏,控制谷物粉尘产生并因此限制储存过程中的重量损失方面比非密封处理明显优越(P <0.001)。尽管塑料衬里在末端处每个塑料衬里有多个由昆虫引起的穿孔,每个塑料衬里有300个以上的孔,但密封袋在减少存储损失方面比非密封处理更有效。但是,无论感染方式如何,金属筒仓和密闭袋之间都没有显着差异。每千克总昆虫种群与以下几类之间有很强的相关性:谷物损害百分率,重量损失百分率和谷物粉尘,这表明在储存期间控制害虫的生长以减少损失的重要性。结果表明,在小农耕作条件下,即使发生LGB的情况下,气密储存也可以有效地替代合成农药,从而减少合成谷物的损失。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号