首页> 外文期刊>Journal of sports sciences. >The effect of high and low percentage ball possession on physical and technical profiles in English FA Premier League soccer matches
【24h】

The effect of high and low percentage ball possession on physical and technical profiles in English FA Premier League soccer matches

机译:高低球控球率对英足联英超足球比赛中身体和技术状况的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The aim of this study was to examine the effects of high (HPBPT) and low percentage ball possession teams (LPBPT) on physical and technical profiles in elite soccer matches. Match performance data were collected from players in the English FA Premier League (n = 810) using a multiple-camera computerised tracking system. Physical indicators such as the total (10690 ± 996 vs 10778 ± 979 m; effect size [ES] = 0.11) and high-intensity running distance covered in matches (931 ± 299 vs 938 ± 311 m; ES = 0.13) did not differ between HPBPT and LPBPT. However, high-intensity running with ball possession in HPBPT was 31% higher (P < 0.01) than LPBPT (449 ± 266 vs 343 ± 236 m; ES = 0.42) but 22% lower without ball possession (423 ± 153 vs 539 ± 177 m; ES = 0.73). Players in HPBPT performed 44% more (P < 0.01) passes than those in LPBPT (35.3 ± 14.2 vs 24.6 ± 11.2; ES = 0.83). This trend was also evident (P < 0.05) for successful passes, received passes, touches per possession, shots, dribbles and final-third entries (ES range of 0.20-0.94). Central defenders of LPBPT covered 33% less (P < 0.01) high-intensity running with ball possession than central defenders of HPBPT. While fullbacks, attackers, central and wide midfielders of LPBPT covered more (P < 0.01) high-intensity running without and less with ball possession than their HPBPT counterparts (ES range of 0.91-1.23). Technical indicators such as total passes and passes received were higher (P < 0.01) across all positions in HPBPT than LPBPT (ES range of 0.82-1.52). The data demonstrate that percentage ball possession does not influence the overall activity profile of a team but impacts on the composition of high-intensity running efforts (with and without ball) and some technical elements of performance. Position-specific changes in physical and technical profiles were evident for teams employing different ball possession percentages and this information could aid training preparation.
机译:这项研究的目的是检验高水平(HPBPT)和低水平的控球率(LPBPT)对精英足球比赛中身体和技术状况的影响。比赛成绩数据是使用多台摄像机的计算机跟踪系统从英超联赛(n = 810)的球员中收集的。物理指标,例如总成绩(10690±996 vs 10778±979 m;效果大小[ES] = 0.11)和比赛中覆盖的高强度跑步距离(931±299 vs 938±311 m; ES = 0.13)没有差异在HPBPT和LPBPT之间。但是,HPBPT持球时的高强度跑步比LPBPT高(39%(P <0.01))(449±266 vs 343±236 m; ES = 0.42),而没有持球时的低强度跑步(423±153 vs 539±) 177 m; ES = 0.73)。与LPBPT中的球员相比,HPBPT中的球员传球多44%(P <0.01)(35.3±14.2 vs 24.6±11.2; ES = 0.83)。对于成功的传球,接收的传球,每回合碰触,投篮,运球和最后三分(ES范围为0.20-0.94),这种趋势也很明显(P <0.05)。 LPBPT的中后卫比HPBPT的中后卫少了33%(P <0.01)持球高强度奔跑。在边后卫方面,LPBPT的进攻者,中距离和中距离中场球员在没有持球的情况下拥有更多(P <0.01)的高强度奔跑,而与HPBPT的对手相比(ES范围为0.91-1.23)。 HPBPT中所有职位的技术指标(如总通过次数和接收的通过次数)均高于LPBPT(ES范围为0.82-1.52)(P <0.01)。数据表明,控球率不会影响团队的整体活动情况,但会影响高强度奔跑努力(有球和无球)的组成以及某些性能技术要素。对于采用不同控球率的球队来说,身体和技术状况的特定位置变化是显而易见的,并且该信息可以帮助培训准备。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号