...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases: The official journal of National Stroke Association >A Prospective Nonrandomized Study on Carotid Surgery Performed under General Anesthesia without Intraoperative Cerebral Monitoring
【24h】

A Prospective Nonrandomized Study on Carotid Surgery Performed under General Anesthesia without Intraoperative Cerebral Monitoring

机译:在不进行术中脑监护的情况下进行全麻下颈动脉手术的前瞻性非随机研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: The purpose of this study was to assess our experience of carotid surgery habitually performed under general anesthesia without intraoperative intracerebral monitoring, and following a pre-established perioperative protocol, which includes extensive use of an intraoperative shunt (IOS). Methods: This study included 311 consecutive carotid operations performed over 32 months. This patient cohort represents 14% of our total experience in carotid surgery (2219 operations, major stroke/mortality rate: 1.4%). The IOS was inserted routinely in the presence of intraoperative blood pressure instability during cross-clamping and when the predictable clamping time might have exceeded 20 minutes. A moderate and stable hypertension was maintained throughout surgery without IOS. Results: Overall, 120 (38.6%) endarterectomies were performed with primary closure, 73 (23.5%) with eversion technique, 113 (36.3%) with patch angioplasty, and 5 (1.6%) with other techniques. Out of 113 patch angioplasties, 111 (98.2%) were performed with an IOS. This was utilized in only 3 cases of direct carotid reconstructions or other carotid endarterectomy techniques (1.5%). Overall, the IOS placement rate was 36.7%. Postoperatively, 2 major strokes (.64%), 2 minor strokes (.64%), 4 hyperperfusion syndromes (1.3%), and no mortality were recorded. No cases of cross-clamp ischemia/shunt-related perioperative strokes were observed. Conclusions: The low perioperative stroke rate reported in this prospective study proves the advantages of wide use of IOS during carotid surgery. This coupled with a large experience in carotid surgery and close monitoring and support of blood pressure, are the major determinants of these results that demonstrate the low risk of shunt-related complications for surgeons who regularly utilize an IOS.
机译:背景:这项研究的目的是评估我们习惯性的全麻下颈动脉外科手术的经验,而没有进行术中脑内监测,并且遵循了预先建立的围术期协议,其中包括广泛使用术中分流术(IOS)。方法:本研究包括在32个月内连续进行的311次颈动脉手术。该患者队列占我们颈动脉手术总经验的14%(2219例手术,主要卒中/死亡率:1.4%)。在交叉夹持期间术中血压不稳定的情况下,并且可预测的夹持时间可能超过20分钟时,常规插入IOS。没有IOS的整个手术过程中维持中度和稳定的高血压。结果:总体而言,初次闭合手术共进行了120次(38.6%)内膜切除术,外翻技术进行了73次(23.5%),膜片成形术进行了113次(36.3%),其他技术进行了5次(1.6%)。在113处补片血管成形术中,有111例(98.2%)采用了IOS。仅3例直接进行了颈动脉重建术或其他颈动脉内膜切除术(1.5%)。总体而言,IOS放置率为36.7%。术后有2例大中风(.64%),2例小中风(.64%),4例高灌注综合征(1.3%),无死亡率。没有观察到交叉钳夹缺血/分流相关的围手术期卒中的病例。结论:该前瞻性研究报道的低围手术期卒中率证明了在颈动脉手术中广泛使用IOS的优势。这些结果加上在颈动脉手术中的丰富经验以及对血压的密切监测和支持,是这些结果的主要决定因素,这些结果表明,对于定期使用IOS的外科医生而言,与分流相关的并发症的风险较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号