首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >POSTACTIVATION POTENTIATION ENHANCES UPPER- AND LOWER-BODY ATHLETIC PERFORMANCE IN COLLEGIATE MALE AND FEMALE ATHLETES
【24h】

POSTACTIVATION POTENTIATION ENHANCES UPPER- AND LOWER-BODY ATHLETIC PERFORMANCE IN COLLEGIATE MALE AND FEMALE ATHLETES

机译:后激活电位增强了普通男性和女性运动员的上体和下体的运动表现

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of postactivation potentiation (PAP)inducing activities in 4 separate studies examining vertical (VJP) and horizontal (HJP) jump performance, shot put performance (SPP), and sprint performance (SP), in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division II athletes. Study 1: 12 male (mean +/- SD; age = 20.2 +/- 2.0 years; height = 178.1 +/- 6.2 cm; weight = 73.3 +/- 6.43 kg) and 8 female (age = 20.1 +/- 1.0 years; height = 169.6 +/- 5.5 cm; weight = 59.8 +/- 7.6 kg) track athletes participated in HJP and VJP testing before and after performing a parallel back squat (PBS) at 85% 1 repetition maximum (RM). Study 2: 10 (6 men and 4 women) shot put throwers (age = 20.6 +/- 0.7 years; height = 182.1 +/- 9.8 cm; weight = 102.8 +/- 23.6 kg) participated in SPP testing for control (C), 3RM bench press, and 3RM PBS protocols. Study 3: 7 football players (age = 20.4 +/- 1.6 years; weight = 87.8 +/- 8.3 kg; height = 184.3 +/- 7.2 cm) participated in SP testing before (PBS1) and after (PBS2) performing a 3RM PBS. Study 4: 11 football players (age = 20.3 +/- 1.8 years; height = 180.6 +/- 7.5 cm; weight = 86.1 +/- 12.8 kg) participated in VJP testing for C and 3RM PBS protocols. Results of study 1: There was a significant (p <= 0.05) increase in VJP (PRE = 61.9 +/- 12.3 cm; POST = 63.6 +/- 11.6 cm) and HJP (PRE = 93.7 +/- 11.0 cm; POST = 95.9 +/- 11.5 cm). Study 2: SPP after PBS (11.67 +/- 1.92 m) was not different vs. C (11.77 +/- 1.81), but bench press (11.91 +/- 1.81 m) was significantly greater (p <= 0.05) than both PBS and C. Study 3: SP time was significantly lower for PBS2 (4.6014 +/- 0.17995 seconds) vs. PB1 (4.6557 +/- 0.19603 seconds). Study 4: There was no difference in VJP for C (68.35 +/- 2.16 cm) vs. PBS (68.12 +/- 2.51 cm). Our data show that a 3RM PBS resulted in significant improvements in VJP, HJP, SPP, and SP in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division II male and female athletes. Strength and conditioning practitioners should potentially alter their warm-up programs to include PAP protocols to enhance performance of power athletes. However, there were nonresponders in each study, and coaches and athletes need to determine whether it is worthwhile to identify nonresponders before implementing PAP protocols.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定4个独立研究中的激活后增强(PAP)诱导活性的影响,这些研究分别考察了垂直(VJP)和水平(HJP)跳跃表现,铅球表现(SPP)和短跑表现(SP),国家大学田径协会II级运动员。研究1:12名男性(平均+/- SD;年龄= 20.2 +/- 2.0岁;身高= 178.1 +/- 6.2厘米;体重= 73.3 +/- 6.43公斤)和8名女性(年龄= 20.1 +/- 1.0年;身高= 169.6 +/- 5.5厘米;体重= 59.8 +/- 7.6公斤)田径运动员在进行平行后深蹲(PBS)且最大重复次数(RM)为85%之前和之后参加了HJP和VJP测试。研究2:10名(6名男性和4名女性)铅球运动员(年龄= 20.6 +/- 0.7岁;身高= 182.1 +/- 9.8厘米;体重= 102.8 +/- 23.6公斤)参加了SPP对照测试(C ),3RM卧推和3RM PBS协议。研究3:7名足球运动员(年龄= 20.4 +/- 1.6岁;体重= 87.8 +/- 8.3公斤;身高= 184.3 +/- 7.2厘米)在进行3RM之前(PBS1)和之后(PBS2)参加了SP测试PBS。研究4:11名足球运动员(年龄= 20.3 +/- 1.8岁;身高= 180.6 +/- 7.5厘米;体重= 86.1 +/- 12.8公斤)参加了针对C和3RM PBS协议的VJP测试。研究结果1:VJP(PRE = 61.9 +/- 12.3 cm; POST = 63.6 +/- 11.6 cm)和HJP(PRE = 93.7 +/- 11.0 cm; POST)显着(p <= 0.05)增加= 95.9 +/- 11.5厘米)。研究2:PBS(11.67 +/- 1.92 m)后的SPP与C(11.77 +/- 1.81)相比无差异,但卧推(11.91 +/- 1.81 m)明显大于两者(p <= 0.05) PBS和C。研究3:与PB1(4.6557 +/- 0.19603秒)相比,PBS2(4.6014 +/- 0.17995秒)的SP时间显着降低。研究4:C(68.35 +/- 2.16 cm)与PBS(68.12 +/- 2.51 cm)的VJP没有差异。我们的数据表明,3RM PBS可以显着改善美国国家田径协会II级男女运动员的VJP,HJP,SPP和SP。力量和体能练习者应潜在地改变他们的热身计划,以包括PAP协议以增强力量运动员的表现。但是,每个研究中都存在未回答者,教练和运动员需要确定在实施PAP协议之前是否值得识别未回答者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号