...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >Comparison of Energy Expenditure During Single-Set vs. Multiple-Set Resistance Exercise
【24h】

Comparison of Energy Expenditure During Single-Set vs. Multiple-Set Resistance Exercise

机译:单组和多组抵抗运动期间能量消耗的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Mookerjee, S, Welikonich, MJ, and Ratamess, NA. Comparison of energy expenditure during single-set vs. multiple-set resistance exercise. J Strength Cond Res 30(5): 1447-1452, 2016The purpose of this study was to compare energy expenditure (EE) of single-set and multiple-set resistance exercise protocols using indirect calorimetry. Twelve men and twelve women (age = 21.4 +/- 1.3 years) performed a single-set (SS) and multiple-set (MS) resistance exercise protocol in random order. The subjects performed two protocols at 70% of their 1-repetition maximum. The protocols consisted of 5 upper-body exercises of either 1 or 3 sets per exercise performed in random order. Metabolic and cardiorespiratory data were recorded over the entire exercise session and during 5 minutes of recovery by a portable metabolic measurement system. Gross (167.9 +/- 58.7 kcal) and net (88.3 +/- 41.6 kcal) EE for the MS protocol were significantly greater (p < 0.001) than gross (71.3 +/- 26.5 kcal) and net (36.3 +/- 18.7 kcal) EE of the SS protocol. Conversely, there was no significant difference in the rate of EE between both protocols. Significant gender differences (p < 0.001) in absolute and relative EE were observed for both protocols where values in men were higher than women. Heart rate, respiratory rate, relative V.o(2), respiratory exchange ratio, and minute ventilation values were significantly higher during the MS than the SS protocol. The results of this study indicated that MS protocols yield greater metabolic and cardiovascular demands than SS protocols when the number of exercises performed is the same.
机译:Mookerjee,S,Welikonich,MJ和Ratamess,NA。单组和多组阻力运动期间能量消耗的比较。 J Strength Cond Res 30(5):1447-1452,2016本研究的目的是使用间接量热法比较单组和多组阻力锻炼方案的能量消耗(EE)。 12名男性和12名女性(年龄= 21.4 +/- 1.3岁)以随机顺序执行了单组(SS)和多组(MS)抵抗运动方案。受试者以其1次重复最大值的70%执行了两个方案。实验方案包括5个上半身运动,每个运动按随机顺序进行1或3组。在整个运动过程中以及通过便携式代谢测量系统恢复的5分钟内,记录了代谢和心肺数据。 MS协议的EE总值(167.9 +/- 58.7 kcal)和净值(88.3 +/- 41.6 kcal)显着大于(p <0.001)总值(71.3 +/- 26.5 kcal)和净值(36.3 +/- 18.7) kcal)SS协议的EE。相反,两种方案之间的EE率没有显着差异。在两种方案中,绝对值和相对值EE均存在明显的性别差异(p <0.001),其中男性的值高于女性。 MS期间的心率,呼吸频率,相对V.o(2),呼吸交换率和分钟通气值均显着高于SS方案。这项研究的结果表明,当运动次数相同时,MS方案比SS方案产生更高的代谢和心血管需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号