首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Exercise Science >Influence of Differences in Exercise-intensity and Kilograms/Set on Energy Expenditure During and After Maximally Explosive Resistance Exercise
【24h】

Influence of Differences in Exercise-intensity and Kilograms/Set on Energy Expenditure During and After Maximally Explosive Resistance Exercise

机译:爆发力抵抗运动期间和之后运动强度和公斤/组差异对能量消耗的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

With resistance exercise, greater intensity typically elicits increased energy expenditure, but heavier loads require that the lifter perform more sets of fewer repetitions, which alters the kilograms lifted per set. Thus, the effect of exercise-intensity on energy expenditure has yielded varying results, especially with explosive resistance exercise. This study was designed to examine the effect of exercise-intensity and kilograms/set on energy expenditure during explosive resistance exercise. Ten resistance-trained men (22±3.6 years; 84±6.4 kg, 180±5.1 cm, and 13±3.8 %fat) performed squat and bench press protocols once/week using different exercise-intensities including 48% (LIGHT-48), 60% (MODERATE-60), and 72% of 1-repetition-maximum (1-RM) (HEAVY-72), plus a no-exercise protocol (CONTROL). To examine the effects of kilograms/set, an additional protocol using 72% of 1-RM was performed (HEAVY-72MATCHED) with kilograms/set matched with LIGHT-48 and MODERATE-60. LIGHT-48 was 4 sets of 10 repetitions (4x10); MODERATE-60 4x8; HEAVY-72 5x5; and HEAVY-72MATCHED 4x6.5. Eccentric and concentric repetition speeds, ranges-of-motion, rest-intervals, and total kilograms were identical between protocols. Expired air was collected continuously throughout each protocol using a metabolic cart, [Blood lactate] using a portable analyzer, and bench press peak power were measured. Rates of energy expenditure were significantly greater (p≤0.05) with LIGHT-48 and HEAVY-72MATCHED than HEAVY-72 during squat (7.3±0.7; 6.9±0.6 > 6.1±0.7 kcal/min), bench press (4.8±0.3; 4.7±0.3 > 4.0±0.4 kcal/min), and +5min after (3.7±0.1; 3.7±0.2 > 3.3±0.3 kcal/min), but there were no significant differences in total kcal among protocols. Therefore, exercise-intensity may not effect energy expenditure with explosive contractions, but light loads (~50% of 1-RM) may be preferred because of higher rates of energy expenditure, and since heavier loading requires more sets with lower kilograms/set.
机译:进行阻力运动时,更大的强度通常会引起能量消耗的增加,但是较重的负载要求举重运动员执行更多组且重复次数更少,从而改变每组举起的公斤数。因此,运动强度对能量消耗的影响产生了不同的结果,尤其是在爆发力抵抗运动中。本研究旨在检查运动强度和公斤/组对爆发力抗性锻炼期间能量消耗的影响。十名接受抵抗运动训练的男性(22±3.6岁; 84±6.4 kg,180±5.1 cm和13±3.8%脂肪)每周一次下蹲和卧推方案,使用不同的运动强度,包括48%(LIGHT-48) ,60%(MODERATE-60)和72%的1次重复最大(1-RM)(HEAVY-72),以及一项无运动协议(CONTROL)。为了检查公斤/套的效果,执行了另一项使用72%1-RM的协议(HEAVY-72MATCHED),公斤/套与LIGHT-48和MODERATE-60相匹配。 LIGHT-48是4组,每组10次重复(4x10); MODERATE-60 4x8; HEAVY-72 5x5;和HEAVY-72MATCHED 4x6.5。协议之间的偏心和同心重复速度,运动范围,休息间隔和总公斤数相同。在整个实验过程中,使用代谢推车连续收集呼出的空气,使用便携式分析仪[乳酸血]并测量卧推峰值功率。蹲下(7.3±0.7; 6.9±0.6> 6.1±0.7 kcal / min),卧推(4.8±0.3; 4.8);卧推(4.8±0.3; 4.7±0.3> 4.0±0.4 kcal / min)和+ 5min(3.7±0.1; 3.7±0.2> 3.3±0.3 kcal / min),但方案之间的总kcal没有显着差异。因此,运动强度可能不会影响爆炸性收缩的能量消耗,但由于较高的能量消耗率,并且较轻的负载(1-RM的〜50%)可能是优选的,并且由于较重的负载需要使用更多的集合,而千克/套数较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号