首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC AND KINETIC COMPARISON OF THE BACK SQUAT AND OVERHEAD SQUAT
【24h】

ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC AND KINETIC COMPARISON OF THE BACK SQUAT AND OVERHEAD SQUAT

机译:后深蹲和头顶蹲的电学和运动学比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aspe, RR and Swinton, PA. Electromyographic and kinetic comparison of the back squat and overhead squat. J Strength Cond Res 28(10): 2827-2836, 2014The purpose of this study was to compare muscle activity and kinetics during the back squat and overhead squat performed at 3 relative intensities (60, 75, and 90% 3 repetition maximum). Fourteen subjects (age, 26 +/- 7 years; height, 182.5 +/- 13.5 cm; body mass, 90.5 +/- 17.5 kg) performed each exercise using a within-subjects crossover design. In addition, a selection of trunk isolation exercises were included to provide additional comparisons. Squats were performed on a force platform with electromyographic activity of the anterior deltoid, rectus abdominis (RA), external oblique (EO), erector spinae (ES), gluteus maximus, vastus lateralis, biceps femoris, and lateral gastrocnemius recorded throughout. The overhead squat demonstrated significantly greater (p 0.05) activity in the anterior trunk muscles (RA and EO) during the eccentric phase. However, the magnitudes of the differences were relatively small (approximately 2-7%). In contrast, the back squat displayed significantly greater (p 0.05) activity in the posterior aspect of the trunk ES and all lower-body muscles during the concentric phase. Kinetic comparisons revealed that significantly greater peak force (p 0.05) was developed during the back squat. Electromyographic comparisons between the trunk isolation exercises and squat variations demonstrated substantially greater anterior trunk activity during the isolation exercises, whereas the highest activity in the posterior aspect of the trunk was obtained during the squats (p 0.05). The results of the study do not support the hypothesis that the overhead squat provides a substantially greater stimulus for developing the trunk musculature compared with the back squat.
机译:阿斯佩(RR)和宾夕法尼亚州斯温顿(Swinton)。后蹲和头顶蹲的肌电图和动力学比较。 J Strength Cond Res 28(10):2827-2836,2014该研究的目的是比较以3种相对强度(最大重复次数分别为60、75和90%3)进行的后深蹲和头顶深蹲期间的肌肉活动和动力学。十四项受试者(年龄26 +/- 7岁;身高182.5 +/- 13.5 cm;体重90.5 +/- 17.5 kg)使用受试者内部交叉设计进行了每次锻炼。此外,还包括一些主干隔离练习,以提供更多的比较。下蹲在力量平台上进行,肌电图记录了前三角肌,腹直肌(RA),外斜肌(EO),竖脊肌(ES),臀大肌,侧大肌,股二头肌和腓肠肌的肌电图。在离心阶段,头顶上蹲表现出前躯干肌肉(RA和EO)的明显更大的运动(p 0.05)。但是,差异的大小相对较小(大约2%至7%)。相反,在同心期,后蹲在躯干ES后侧和所有下半身肌肉中表现出明显更大的(p 0.05)活动。动力学比较表明,在后蹲过程中产生了明显更大的峰值力(p 0.05)。躯干隔离运动与下蹲变化之间的肌电图比较表明,隔离运动期间前躯干活动明显增强,而下蹲期间躯干后部活动性最高(p 0.05)。研究结果不支持这样的假设,即与后蹲相比,头顶深蹲对躯干肌肉组织的发育提供了明显更大的刺激。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号