首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >COMPARISONS BETWEEN LOW-INTENSITY RESISTANCE TRAINING WITH BLOOD FLOW RESTRICTION AND HIGH-INTENSITY RESISTANCE TRAINING ON QUADRICEPS MUSCLE MASS AND STRENGTH IN ELDERLY
【24h】

COMPARISONS BETWEEN LOW-INTENSITY RESISTANCE TRAINING WITH BLOOD FLOW RESTRICTION AND HIGH-INTENSITY RESISTANCE TRAINING ON QUADRICEPS MUSCLE MASS AND STRENGTH IN ELDERLY

机译:老年人股四头肌低强度耐力训练与血流受限与高强度耐力训练的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Vechin, FC, Libardi, CA, Conceicao, MS, Damas, FR, Lixandrao, ME, Berton, RPB, Tricoli, VAA, Roschel, HA, Cavaglieri, CR, Chacon-Mikahil, MPT, and Ugrinowitsch, C. Comparisons between low-intensity resistance training with blood flow restriction and high-intensity resistance training on quadriceps muscle mass and strength in elderly. J Strength Cond Res 29(4): 1071-1076, 2015-High-intensity resistance training (HRT) has been recommended to offset age-related loss in muscle strength and mass. However, part of the elderly population is often unable to exercise at high intensities. Alternatively, lowintensity resistance training with blood flow restriction (LRTBFR) has emerged. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of LRT-BFR and HRT on quadriceps muscle strength and mass in elderly. Twenty-three elderly individuals, 14 men and 9 women (age, 64.04 +/- 3.81 years; weight, 72.55 +/- 16.52 kg; height, 163 +/- 11 cm), undertook 12 weeks of training. Subjects were ranked according to their pretraining quadriceps cross-sectional area (CSA) values and then randomly allocated into one of the following groups: (a) control group, (b) HRT: 4 x 10 repetitions, 70-80% one repetition maximum (1RM), and (c) LRT-BFR: 4 sets (1 x 30 and 3 x 15 repetitions), 20-30% 1RM. The occlusion pressure was set at 50% of maximum tibial arterial pressure and sustained during the whole training session. Leg press 1RM and quadriceps CSA were evaluated at before and after training. A mixed-model analysis was performed, and the significance level was set at p <= 0.05. Both training regimes were effective in increasing pre-to post-training leg press 1RM (HRT:; similar to 54%, p < 0.001; LRT-BFR:; similar to 17%, p = 0.067) and quadriceps CSA (HRT: 7.9%, p < 0.001; LRT-BFR: 6.6%, p < 0.001); however, HRT seems to induce greater strength gains. In summary, LRT-BFR constitutes an important surrogate approach to HRT as an effective training method to induce gains in muscle strength and mass in elderly.
机译:Vechin,FC,Libardi,CA,Conceicao,MS,Damas,FR,Lixandrao,ME,Berton,RPB,Tricoli,VAA,Roschel,HA,Cavaglieri,CR,Chacon-Mikahil,MPT和Ugrinowitsch,C.限流的高强度阻力训练和老年人股四头肌肌肉质量和强度的高强度阻力训练。 J Strength Cond Res 29(4):1071-1076,2015-已建议使用高强度抵抗训练(HRT)来抵消与年龄有关的肌肉力量和质量下降。但是,部分老年人通常无法高强度运动。或者,出现了具有血流限制(LRTBFR)的低强度阻力训练。这项研究的目的是比较LRT-BFR和HRT对老年人股四头肌肌肉力量和质量的影响。 23名老年人(14名男性和9名女性)(年龄64.04 +/- 3.81岁;体重72.55 +/- 16.52公斤;身高163 +/- 11厘米)接受了12周的训练。根据他们的训练前四头肌横截面积(CSA)值对受试者进行排名,然后将其随机分为以下组之一:(a)对照组,(b)HRT:4 x 10次重复,一次重复最大70-80% (1RM)和(c)LRT-BFR:4套(1 x 30和3 x 15重复),20-30%1RM。闭塞压力设定为最大胫骨动脉压的50%,并在整个训练过程中保持持续。训练前后分别评估腿部推举1RM和股四头肌CSA。进行了混合模型分析,显着性水平设置为p <= 0.05。两种训练方式均能有效地增加腿部训练前后的压力1RM(HRT :;相似于54%,p <0.001; LRT-BFR :;相似于17%,p = 0.067)和股四头肌CSA(HRT:7.9) %,p <0.001; LRT-BFR:6.6%,p <0.001);但是,HRT似乎会带来更大的强度提升。总而言之,LRT-BFR构成了HRT的重要替代方法,它是诱导老年人肌肉力量和质量增加的有效训练方法。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号