...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Applied Physiology >Combined effects of low-intensity blood flow restriction training and high-intensity resistance training on muscle strength and size
【24h】

Combined effects of low-intensity blood flow restriction training and high-intensity resistance training on muscle strength and size

机译:低强度血流限制训练和高强度阻力训练对肌肉力量和大小的综合影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We investigated the combined effect of low-intensity blood flow restriction and high-intensity resistance training on muscle adaptation. Forty young men (aged 22–32 years) were randomly divided into four groups of ten subjects each: high-intensity resistance training (HI-RT, 75% of one repetition maximum [1-RM]), low-intensity resistance training with blood flow restriction (LI-BFR, 30% 1-RM), combined HI-RT and LI-BFR (CB-RT, twice-weekly LI-BFR and once-weekly HI-RT), and nontraining control (CON). Three training groups performed bench press exercises 3 days/week for 6 weeks. During LI-BFR training sessions, subjects wore pressure cuffs on both arms that were inflated to 100–160 mmHg. Increases in 1-RM were similar in the HI-RT (19.9%) and CB-RT (15.3%) groups and lower in the LI-BFR group (8.7%, p 0.05). Maximal isometric elbow extension (MVC) increased in the HI-RT (11.3%) and CB-RT (6.6%) groups; there was no change in the LI-BFR group (−0.2%). The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the triceps brachii (TB) increased (p 0.05) in the HI-RT (8.6%), CB-RT (7.2%), and LI-BFR (4.4%) groups. The change in relative isometric strength (MVC divided by TB CSA) was greater (p 0.05) in the HI-RT group (3.3%) than in the LI-BFR (−3.5%) and CON (−0.1%) groups. Following training, relative dynamic strength (1-RM divided by TB CSA) was increased (p 0.05) by 10.5% in the HI-RT group and 6.7% in the CB-RT group. None of the variables in the CON group changed. Our results show that low-intensity resistance training with BFR-induced functional muscle adaptations is improved by combining it with HI-RT.
机译:我们研究了低强度血流限制和高强度阻力训练对肌肉适应的综合作用。 40名年轻人(22-32岁)被随机分为四组,每组十个受试者:高强度阻力训练(HI-RT,一次重复最大值[1-RM]的75%),低强度阻力训练限流(LI-BFR,30%1-RM),HI-RT和LI-BFR联合使用(CB-RT,每周两次,LI-BFR和每周一次HI-RT),以及非训练对照(CON)。三个训练小组每周进行3天的卧推练习,持续6周。在LI-BFR训练课程中,受试者的双臂都戴着压力袖带,充气至100-160 mmHg。 HI-RT组(19.9%)和CB-RT组(15.3%)中1-RM的升高相似,而LI-BFR组中的1-RM升高较低(8.7%,p <0.05)。 HI-RT(11.3%)和CB-RT(6.6%)组的最大等距肘伸(MVC)增加; LI-BFR组没有变化(-0.2%)。 HI-RT(8.6%),CB-RT(7.2%)和LI-BFR(4.4%)组的肱三头肌(TB)截面积(CSA)增加(p <0.05)。 HI-RT组(3.3%)的相对等距强度变化(MVC除以TB CSA)比LI-BFR组(-3.5%)和CON组(-0.1%)更大(p <0.05)。训练后,HI-RT组的相对动态强度(1-RM除以TB CSA)增加了(p <0.05)10.5%,而CB-RT组则增加了6.7%。 CON组中的变量均未更改。我们的结果表明,通过将其与HI-RT相结合,可以改善BFR诱导的功能性肌肉适应性低强度耐力训练。

著录项

  • 来源
    《European Journal of Applied Physiology 》 |2011年第10期| p.2525-2533| 共9页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Human and Engineered Environmental Studies, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 5-1-5, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8563, Japan;

    Department of Human and Engineered Environmental Studies, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 5-1-5, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8563, Japan;

    Department of Human and Engineered Environmental Studies, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 5-1-5, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8563, Japan;

    Department of Human and Engineered Environmental Studies, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 5-1-5, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8563, Japan;

    Department of Human and Engineered Environmental Studies, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 5-1-5, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8563, Japan;

    Department of Human and Enginee;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Vascular occlusion; Neural adaptation; Muscle hypertrophy; Muscle strength;

    机译:血管闭塞;神经适应;肌肉肥大;肌肉力量;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号