...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >DOES THE DUMBBELL-CARRYING POSITION CHANGE THE MUSCLE ACTIVITY IN SPLIT SQUATS AND WALKING LUNGES?
【24h】

DOES THE DUMBBELL-CARRYING POSITION CHANGE THE MUSCLE ACTIVITY IN SPLIT SQUATS AND WALKING LUNGES?

机译:登贝运球的位置是否改变了分裂蹲和步行肺中的肌肉活动?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Stastny, P, Lehnert, M, Zaatar, AMZ, Svoboda, Z, and Xaverova, Z. Does the dumbbell-carrying position change the muscle activity in split squats and walking lunges? J Strength Cond Res 29(11): 3177-3187, 2015The forward walking lunge (WL) and split squat (SSq) are similar exercises that have differences in the eccentric phase, and both can be performed in the ipsilateral or contralateral carrying conditions. This study aimed to determine the effects of dumbbell-carrying position on the kinematics and electromyographic (EMG) amplitudes of the gluteus medius (Gmed), vastus medialis (VM), vastus lateralis (VL), and biceps femoris during WLs and SSqs. The resistance-trained (RT) and the non-resistance-trained (NT) groups (both n = 14) performed ipsilateral WLs, contralateral WLs, ipsilateral SSqs, and contralateral SSqs in a randomized order in a simulated training session. The EMG amplitude, expressed as a percentage of the maximal voluntary isometric contraction (%MVIC), and the kinematics, expressed as the range of motion (ROM) of the hip and knee, were measured during 5 repetition maximum for both legs. The repeated measure analyses of variance showed significant differences between the RT and NT groups. The NT group showed a smaller knee flexion ROM (p < 0.001, (2) = 0.36) during both types of WLs, whereas the RT group showed a higher eccentric Gmed amplitude (p < 0.001, (2) = 0.46) during all exercises and a higher eccentric VL amplitude (p < 0.001, (2) = 0.63) during contralateral WLs. Further differences were found between contralateral and ipsilateral WLs in both the RT (p < 0.001, (2) = 0.69) and NT groups (p < 0.001, (2) = 0.80), and contralateral WLs resulted in higher eccentric Gmed amplitudes. Contralateral WLs highly activated the Gmed (90% MVIC); therefore, this exercise can increase the Gmed maximal strength. The ipsilateral loading condition did not increase the Gmed or VM activity in the RT or NT group.
机译:Stastny,P,Lehnert,M,Zatar,AMZ,Svoboda,Z和Xaverova,Z。哑铃的举动位置会改变蹲坐和弓步时的肌肉活动吗? J Strength Cond Res 29(11):3177-3187,2015前向弓步(WL)和深蹲(SSq)是类似的练习,但在偏心期有所不同,并且都可以在同侧或对侧携带条件下进行。这项研究旨在确定在WL和SSqs期间,哑铃位置对中臀肌(Gmed),股内侧肌(VM),股外侧肌(VL)和股二头肌的运动学和肌电图(EMG)振幅的影响。阻力训练组(RT)和非阻力训练组(n = 14)在模拟训练中以随机顺序执行同侧WL,对侧WL,同侧SSq和对侧SSq。在两条腿的最大重复次数为5的过程中,测量了EMG振幅,表示为最大自愿等距收缩(%MVIC)的百分比,运动学表示为臀部和膝盖的运动范围(ROM)。重复测量方差分析显示RT和NT组之间存在显着差异。在两种类型的WL中,NT组均显示较小的膝关节屈曲ROM(p <0.001,(2)= 0.36),而RT组在所有运动中均显示较高的偏心Gmed振幅(p <0.001,(2)= 0.46)。对侧WL时偏心VL振幅较高(p <0.001,(2)= 0.63)。 RT(p <0.001,(2)= 0.69)和NT组(p <0.001,(2)= 0.80)的对侧和同侧WL之间存在进一步的差异,对侧WL导致偏心Gmed振幅更高。对侧WLs高度激活了Gmed(90%MVIC);因此,此运动可以增加Gmed的最大力量。在RT或NT组中,同侧负荷条件并未增加Gmed或VM活性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号