首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Lippincott Williams Wilkins Open Access >Does the Dumbbell-Carrying Position Change the Muscle Activity in Split Squats and Walking Lunges?
【2h】

Does the Dumbbell-Carrying Position Change the Muscle Activity in Split Squats and Walking Lunges?

机译:抬哑铃的姿势是否会改变深蹲和步行刺中的肌肉活动?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Stastny, P, Lehnert, M, Zaatar, AMZ, Svoboda, Z, and Xaverova, Z. Does the dumbbell-carrying position change the muscle activity in split squats and walking lunges? J Strength Cond Res 29(11): 3177–3187, 2015—The forward walking lunge (WL) and split squat (SSq) are similar exercises that have differences in the eccentric phase, and both can be performed in the ipsilateral or contralateral carrying conditions. This study aimed to determine the effects of dumbbell-carrying position on the kinematics and electromyographic (EMG) amplitudes of the gluteus medius (Gmed), vastus medialis (VM), vastus lateralis (VL), and biceps femoris during WLs and SSqs. The resistance-trained (RT) and the non–resistance-trained (NT) groups (both n = 14) performed ipsilateral WLs, contralateral WLs, ipsilateral SSqs, and contralateral SSqs in a randomized order in a simulated training session. The EMG amplitude, expressed as a percentage of the maximal voluntary isometric contraction (%MVIC), and the kinematics, expressed as the range of motion (ROM) of the hip and knee, were measured during 5 repetition maximum for both legs. The repeated measure analyses of variance showed significant differences between the RT and NT groups. The NT group showed a smaller knee flexion ROM (p < 0.001, η2 = 0.36) during both types of WLs, whereas the RT group showed a higher eccentric Gmed amplitude (p < 0.001, η2 = 0.46) during all exercises and a higher eccentric VL amplitude (p < 0.001, η2 = 0.63) during contralateral WLs. Further differences were found between contralateral and ipsilateral WLs in both the RT (p < 0.001, η2 = 0.69) and NT groups (p < 0.001, η2 = 0.80), and contralateral WLs resulted in higher eccentric Gmed amplitudes. Contralateral WLs highly activated the Gmed (90% MVIC); therefore, this exercise can increase the Gmed maximal strength. The ipsilateral loading condition did not increase the Gmed or VM activity in the RT or NT group.
机译:Stastny,P,Lehnert,M,Zatar,AMZ,Svoboda,Z和Xaverova,Z。哑铃的举动位置是否会改变深蹲和弓步步行中的肌肉活动? J Strength Cond Res 29(11):3177–3187,2015年-前向弓步(WL)和深蹲(SSq)是类似的练习,但在偏心期有所不同,并且都可以在同侧或对侧携带中进行条件。这项研究的目的是确定在WL和SSqs期间,哑铃位置对中臀肌(Gmed),股内侧肌(VM),股外侧肌(VL)和股二头肌的运动学和肌电图(EMG)振幅的影响。阻力训练组(RT)和非阻力训练组(n = 14)在模拟训练中以随机顺序执行同侧WL,对侧WL,同侧SSq和对侧SSq。在两条腿的最大重复次数为5的过程中,测量了EMG振幅,表示为最大自愿等距收缩(%MVIC)的百分比,运动学表示为臀部和膝盖的运动范围(ROM)。重复测量方差分析显示RT组和NT组之间存在显着差异。在两种类型的WL中,NT组的膝关节屈曲ROM较小(p <0.001,η 2 = 0.36),而RT组的偏心Gmed振幅较高(p <0.001,η 2 = 0.46),而对侧WL时偏心VL幅度较高(p <0.001,η 2 = 0.63)。在RT(p <0.001,η 2 = 0.69)和NT组(p <0.001,η 2 = 0.80)的对侧和同侧WL之间存在进一步的差异,而对侧WL导致偏心Gmed振幅更高。对侧WLs高度激活了Gmed(90%MVIC);因此,此运动可以增加Gmed的最大力量。在RT或NT组中,同侧负荷条件并未增加Gmed或VM活性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号