...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >EFFECTS OF NONLINEAR RESISTANCE AND AEROBIC INTERVAL TRAINING ON CYTOKINES AND INSULIN RESISTANCE IN SEDENTARY MEN WHO ARE OBESE
【24h】

EFFECTS OF NONLINEAR RESISTANCE AND AEROBIC INTERVAL TRAINING ON CYTOKINES AND INSULIN RESISTANCE IN SEDENTARY MEN WHO ARE OBESE

机译:肥胖抵抗力和有氧运动间歇训练对中年男性细胞因子和胰岛素抵抗的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Regular exercise training has been shown to reduce systemic inflammation, but there is limited research directly comparing different types of training. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of nonlinear resistance training (NRT) and aerobic interval training (AIT) on serum interleukin-10 (IL-10), IL-20, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) levels, insulin resistance index (homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance), and aerobic capacity in middle-aged men who are obese. Sedentary volunteers were assigned to NRT (n = 12), AIT (n = 12), and (CON, n = 10) control groups. The experimental groups performed 3 weekly sessions for 12 weeks, whereas the CON grouped maintained a sedentary lifestyle. Nonlinear resistance training consisted of 40-65 minutes of weight training at different intensities with flexible periodization. Aerobic interval training consisted of running on a treadmill (4 sets of 4 minutes at 80-90% of maximal heart rate, with 3-minute recovery intervals). Serum IL-10, IL-20, and TNF-alpha levels did not change significantly in response to training (all p > 0.05), but IL-10: TNF-alpha ratio increased significantly with AIT compared with CON (2.95 +/- 0.84 vs. 2.52 +/- 0.65; p = 0.02). After the training period, maximal oxygen uptake increased significantly in AIT and NRT compared with CON (both p < 0.001; 46.7 +/- 5.9, 45.1 +/- 3.2, and 41.1 +/- 4.7 ml.kg(-1).min(-1), respectively) and in AIT than in NRT (p = 0.001). The 2 exercise programs were equally effective at reducing insulin resistance (homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance) (both p <= 0.05; AIT: 0.84 +/- 0.34, NRT: 0.84 +/- 0.27, and CON: 1.62 +/- 0.56) and fasting insulin levels (both p <= 0.05; AIT: 3.61 +/- 1.48, NRT: 3.66 +/- 0.92, and CON: 6.20 +/- 2.64 mu U.ml(-1)), but the AIT seems to have better anti-inflammatory effects (as indicated by the IL-10: TNF-alpha ratio) compared with NRT.
机译:定期运动训练已显示可减少全身性炎症,但直接比较不同类型的训练的研究有限。这项研究的目的是比较非线性抵抗训练(NRT)和有氧间歇训练(AIT)对血清白介素10(IL-10),IL-20和肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)的影响肥胖中年男子的血脂水平,胰岛素抵抗指数(胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估)和有氧运动能力。久坐的志愿者被分为NRT(n = 12),AIT(n = 12)和(CON,n = 10)对照组。实验组每周进行3次,共12周,而CON组则保持久坐的生活方式。非线性阻力训练包括在不同强度下进行40-65分钟的重量训练,并具有灵活的周期。有氧间歇训练包括在跑步机上跑步(4组4分钟,最大心率的80-90%,恢复间隔3分钟)。血清IL-10,IL-20和TNF-α的水平并未因训练而显着变化(所有p> 0.05),但与CON相比,AIT的IL-10:TNF-α的比例显着增加(2.95 +/- 0.84比2.52 +/- 0.65; p = 0.02)。训练期后,与CON相比,AIT和NRT的最大摄氧量显着增加(p <0.001; 46.7 +/- 5.9、45.1 +/- 3.2和41.1 +/- 4.7 ml.kg(-1).min (-1))和AIT相比NRT(p = 0.001)。这两个运动程序在降低胰岛素抵抗方面均有效(胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估)(p <= 0.05; AIT:0.84 +/- 0.34,NRT:0.84 +/- 0.27,CON:1.62 +/- 0.56 )和空腹胰岛素水平(p <= 0.05; AIT:3.61 +/- 1.48,NRT:3.66 +/- 0.92,CON:6.20 +/- 2.64μU.ml(-1)),但AIT似乎与NRT相比具有更好的抗炎作用(如IL-10:TNF-α比值所示)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号