...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of strength and conditioning research >Rocker-bottom, profile-type shoes do not increase lower extremity muscle activity or energy cost of walking
【24h】

Rocker-bottom, profile-type shoes do not increase lower extremity muscle activity or energy cost of walking

机译:摇杆底轮廓型鞋不会增加下肢的肌肉活动或步行能量消耗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The purpose of this study was to determine if wearing rocker-bottom shoes with compliant midsoles (RB) influences muscle activity and metabolic cost of walking. Furthermore, we sought to determine if weight differences between shod conditions accounted for any potential change. Twenty-eight subjects (17 women, 11 men, age 22.8 ± 6.6 years; weight 72 ± 20 kg; height 170 ± 6.7 cm; percent body fat 23.0 ± 11.7) walked on a treadmill (0% grade) for 10 minutes at a self-selected speed plus 10% (1.3 ± 0.2 m-s -) in each of the following laboratory-provided shoes: flat-bottomed shoe (W), flat-bottomed shoe weight-matched to RB (WM), and RB. Muscle activity of the right side biceps femoris (BF), rectus femoris (RF), gastrocnemius (GA), and tibalis anterior (TA) was recorded for 30 seconds at the beginning, middle, and ending of the 10-minute walk using an electromyography (EMG) system. The average (AVG) and root mean square (RMS) were calculated from full-wave rectified EMG data at each interval. The rate of oxygen consumption (- VO 2) was measured for 10 minutes during each condition. A 3 (shoe) 3 3 (time) repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare each EMG-dependent variable (AVG and RMS EMG of each muscle), and repeated measures ANOVA was used to test - VO 2. Muscle activity (for any muscle) was not influenced by the interaction of shoe and time (p 0.05). The AVG and RMS for RF, BF, and GA, including -VO 2, were not different among shod conditions (W: 9.7 ± 0.6 ml·kg -·min -; WM: 10.0 ± 0.5 ml·kg -·min -; RB: 10.1 ± 0.5 ml·kg -·min -), whereas TA AVG and RMS were lower during RB (p , 0.05). It seems that there is no increase in muscle activity or metabolic cost while wearing RB beyond the flat-bottomed shoe despite there being the rocker-profile design and mass differences.
机译:这项研究的目的是确定穿着带顺应中底(RB)的摇底鞋是否会影响肌肉活动和步行的代谢成本。此外,我们试图确定擦鞋条件之间的重量差异是否导致了任何潜在的变化。 28名受试者(17名女性,11名男性,年龄22.8±6.6岁;体重72±20千克;身高170±6.7厘米;体脂百分比23.0±11.7)在跑步机上(0%等级)走了10分钟。自行选择的速度加上以下实验室提供的每种鞋的10%(1.3±0.2 ms-):平底鞋(W),重量与RB(WM)相匹配的平底鞋和RB。在第10分钟步行的开始,中间和结束时,记录30分钟的右侧股二头肌(BF),股直肌(RF),腓肠肌(GA)和胫骨前肌(TA)的肌肉活动,肌电图(EMG)系统。均值(AVG)和均方根(RMS)由每个时间间隔的全波整流EMG数据计算得出。在每种条件下,持续10分钟测量氧气消耗率(-VO 2)。使用3(鞋)3 3(时间)重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)来比较每个EMG依赖变量(每条肌肉的AVG和RMS EMG),并使用重复测量ANOVA来测试-VO 2。肌肉活动(对于任何肌肉)不受鞋子和时间之间的相互作用的影响(p> 0.05)。 RF,BF和GA的AVG和RMS(包括-VO 2)在不同条件下均无差异(W:9.7±0.6 ml·kg-·min-; WM:10.0±0.5 ml·kg-·min-; RB:10.1±0.5 ml·kg-·min-),而RB期间的TA AVG和RMS较低(p,0.05)。似乎在平底鞋以外穿着RB时,尽管存在摇摆式外形设计和质量差异,但肌肉活动或新陈代谢成本并没有增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号