...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Sound and Vibration >Shear deformable versus classical theories for nonlinear vibrations of rectangular isotropic and laminated composite plates
【24h】

Shear deformable versus classical theories for nonlinear vibrations of rectangular isotropic and laminated composite plates

机译:剪切变形与经典理论的矩形各向同性和层合复合板的非线性振动

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In the present study, (i) the classical Von Karman theory, (ii) the first-order shear deformation theory and (iii) the higher-order (third-order) shear deformation theory are compared for studying the nonlinear forced vibrations of isotropic and laminate composite rectangular plates. In particular, the harmonic response in the frequency neighborhood of the fundamental mode of rectangular plates is investigated and the response curves computed by using the three different theories are compared, The boundary conditions of the plates are simply supported with immovable edges. Geometric imperfections are taken into account. Calculations for isotropic and laminated composite plates are presented and results are discussed. For isotropic plates, the frequency-response curves for large-amplitude vibrations obtained by using the three theories are almost coincident. For laminated composite plates, differences arise for relatively thick plates (ratio between the thickness and the edge equal to 0.1), while for thin plates (ratio between the thickness and the edge equal to 0.01), no difference is obtained. For all cases, the first-order shear deformation (with shear correction factor root 3-/2) and the higher-order shear deformation theories give practically coincident results and differences Eire observed with respect to the classical Von Karman theory. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在本研究中,比较了(i)经典的Von Karman理论,(ii)一阶剪切变形理论和(iii)高阶(三阶)剪切变形理论,以研究各向同性的非线性强迫振动。和层压复合矩形板。特别地,研究了矩形板基本模式的频率邻域中的谐波响应,并比较了使用三种不同理论计算出的响应曲线,并用不动的边缘简单地支撑了板的边界条件。考虑了几何缺陷。给出了各向同性和层合复合板的计算并讨论了结果。对于各向同性板,使用这三种理论获得的大振幅振动的频率响应曲线几乎是重合的。对于层压复合板,相对厚的板(厚度与边缘之比等于0.1)会产生差异,而薄板(厚度与边缘之比等于0.01)则没有差异。在所有情况下,一阶剪切变形(剪切校正因数根为3- / 2)和高阶剪切变形理论给出的结果实际上是重合的,而Eire相对于经典的冯·卡曼理论却有所不同。 (C)2008 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号