...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of spinal disorders & techniques. >Clinical accuracy of cervicothoracic pedicle screw placement: a comparison of the 'open' lamino-foraminotomy and computer-assisted techniques.
【24h】

Clinical accuracy of cervicothoracic pedicle screw placement: a comparison of the 'open' lamino-foraminotomy and computer-assisted techniques.

机译:颈胸腰椎椎弓根螺钉置入的临床准确性:“开放式”椎间孔切开术和计算机辅助技术的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Posterior transpedicular fixation at the cervicothoracic junction (CTJ) is increasing in popularity. However, the clinical accuracy of pedicle screw placement at the CTJ has not been specifically assessed. METHODS: Between January 2000 and July 2004, 60 consecutive patients underwent a variety of posterior spinal procedures necessitating pedicle screw placement at C7, T1, and T2. Thirty-two patients had cervicothoracic screws (3.5 to 4.5 mm) placed by an "open" technique (laminectomies or lamino-foraminotomies) and 28 patients with either a closed (before any decompression) 2-dimensional (n=19, fluoroscopy) or 3-dimensional (n=9, CT) computer-assisted technique. Screws were independently assessed for pedicle breach on postoperative CT and scored using a points-based classification system. RESULTS: The total number of screws placed was 86, 63 and 45 in the open, closed-2-dimensional and closed-3-dimensional groups, respectively. Overall, 61(70.9%), 51(81%), and 40(89%) screws were completely within the pedicle. In the open group, the majority of pedicle breaches were more than 2 mm [n=3 (<2 mm), n=20 (2-4 mm), n=2 (>4 mm)]. Screw violation occurred laterally 11/25(44%), medially 3/25(12%), inferiorly 7/25(28%), and superiorly 4/25(16%). In the closed technique, all breaches were lateral. Seventeen screws (n=11-2-dimensional, n=5-3-dimensional) breached the pedicle by a margin of less than 2 mm and 1 screw (2-dimensional) by 2 to 4 mm. Pedicle screw accuracy was significantly improved with computer-assisted techniques. However, there was no significant difference between the 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional techniques. For all patients, there were no clinically significant screw misplacements, nor any need for screw revision. CONCLUSIONS: Computer-assisted surgery allows for more accurate placement of pedicle screws at the CTJ. Although a higher proportion of major pedicular breaches occurred in the "open lamina/lamino-foraminotomy" group, no screws required revision in either group.
机译:目的:颈椎弓根交界处的后路椎弓根固定术越来越受欢迎。但是,尚未专门评估CTJ处椎弓根螺钉放置的临床准确性。方法:2000年1月至2004年7月,连续60例患者接受了各种脊柱后路手术,因此需要在C7,T1和T2放置椎弓根螺钉。 32例患者通过“开放式”技术(椎板切开术或椎间孔切开术)置入了颈胸椎螺钉(3.5至4.5 mm),而28例采用二维(n = 19,透视检查)或闭式(未减压前)术或3维(n = 9,CT)计算机辅助技术。在术后CT上独立评估螺钉的椎弓根断裂情况,并使用基于点的分类系统对其进行评分。结果:在开放,封闭二维和封闭三维组中,放置的螺丝总数分别为86、63和45。总体上,有61个(70.9%),51个(81%)和40个(89%)螺钉完全位于椎弓根内。在开放组中,大多数椎弓根切开术超过2 mm [n = 3(<2 mm),n = 20(2-4 mm),n = 2(> 4 mm)]。外侧发生螺钉破坏的情况为外侧11/25(44%),内侧发生3/25(12%),下方发生7/25(28%)和上方发生4/25(16%)。在封闭式技术中,所有漏洞都是横向攻击。十七个螺钉(n = 11-2维,n = 5-3维)以小于2毫米的间距切入椎弓根,而1个螺钉(二维)以2至4毫米切开。椎弓根螺钉的准确性通过计算机辅助技术得到了显着提高。但是,二维和3维技术之间没有显着差异。对于所有患者,没有临床上明显的螺丝钉错位,也不需要螺丝钉矫正。结论:计算机辅助手术可使椎弓根螺钉更精确地放置在CTJ上。尽管“开放性椎板/拉米诺-椎间孔切开术”组发生较大比例的重大椎弓根破裂,但两组均无需螺钉修复。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号