...
首页> 外文期刊>Spine >Accuracy analysis of pedicle screw placement in posterior scoliosis surgery: comparison between conventional fluoroscopic and computer-assisted technique.
【24h】

Accuracy analysis of pedicle screw placement in posterior scoliosis surgery: comparison between conventional fluoroscopic and computer-assisted technique.

机译:后路脊柱侧弯手术中椎弓根螺钉置入的准确性分析:常规透视与计算机辅助技术之间的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

STUDY DESIGN: The accuracy of pedicle screw placement was evaluated in posterior scoliosis surgeries with or without the use of computer-assisted surgical techniques. OBJECTIVE: In this retrospective cohort study, the pedicle screw placement accuracy in posterior scoliosis surgery was compared between conventional fluoroscopic and computer-assisted surgical techniques. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There has been no study systemically analyzing the perforation pattern and comparative accuracy of pedicle screw placement in posterior scoliosis surgery. METHODS: The 45 patients who received posterior correction surgeries were divided into 2 groups: Group C, manual control (25 patients); and Group N, navigation surgery (20 patients). The average Cobb angles were 73.7 degrees and 73.1 degrees before surgery in Group C and Group N, respectively. Using CT images, vertebral rotation, pedicle axes as measured to anteroposterior sacral axis and vertebral axis, and insertion angle error were measured. In perforation cases, the angular tendency, insertion point, and length abnormality were evaluated. RESULTS: The perforation was observed in 11% of Group C and 1.8% in Group N. In Group C, medial perforations of left screws were demonstrated in 8 of 9 perforated screws and 55% were distributed either in L1 or T12. The perforation consistently occurred in pedicles in which those axes approached anteroposterior sacral axis within 5 degrees . The average insertion errors were 8.4 degrees and 5.0 degrees in Group C and Group N, respectively, which were significantly different (P < 0.02). CONCLUSION: The medial perforation in Group C occurred around L1, especially when pedicle axis approached anteroposterior sacral axis. This consistent tendency was considered as the limitation of fluoroscopic screw insertion in which horizontal vertebral image was not visible. The use of surgical navigation system successfully reduced the perforation rate and insertion angle errors, demonstrating the clear advantage in safe and accurate pedicle screw placement of scoliosis surgery.
机译:研究设计:在有或没有使用计算机辅助手术技术的情况下,对后路脊柱侧弯手术中椎弓根螺钉放置的准确性进行了评估。目的:在这项回顾性队列研究中,比较了传统荧光检查和计算机辅助手术技术在后路脊柱侧弯手术中椎弓根螺钉放置的准确性。背景资料概述:尚无研究系统地分析后路脊柱侧弯手术中的穿孔模式和椎弓根螺钉放置的相对准确性。方法:将45例接受后路矫正手术的患者分为2组:C组,手法对照(25例); C组,手法对照(25例)。 N组导航手术(20例患者)。 C组和N组术前平均Cobb角分别为73.7度和73.1度。使用CT图像,测量椎骨旋转,椎弓根轴至to骨轴和椎骨轴的测量值以及插入角度误差。在穿孔情况下,评估了角度趋势,插入点和长度异常。结果:在C组的11%和N组的1.8%中观察到穿孔。在C组中,在9个带孔螺钉中的8个中显示了左螺钉的内侧穿孔,其中55%分布在L1或T12中。椎弓根穿孔持续发生在那些轴在5度内接近骨轴的位置。 C组和N组的平均插入误差分别为8.4度和5.0度,差异有统计学意义(P <0.02)。结论:C组内侧穿孔发生在L1周围,尤其是当椎弓根轴接近骨前后轴时。这种一致的趋势被认为是透视螺钉插入的局限性,其中水平椎骨图像不可见。手术导航系统的使用成功降低了穿孔率和插入角度误差,证明了在安全,准确地脊柱侧弯手术椎弓根螺钉置入方面的明显优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号