首页> 外文期刊>Journal of spinal disorders & techniques. >Operative treatment for coccygodynia.
【24h】

Operative treatment for coccygodynia.

机译:球后痛的手术治疗。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Few data exist comparing the surgical and nonsurgical treatment of coccygodynia. We sought to retrospectively review our experience with coccygectomy compared with injections for the relief of coccygodynia to determine rates of success and patient satisfaction and identify complications. METHODS: From March 1993 to January 2002, 51 consecutive patients with the diagnosis of coccygodynia were evaluated. All of the patients complained of pain while sitting and had localized pain to external and internal palpation of the coccyx on physical examination. Nonoperative treatment (medications, cushions, therapy) had failed to relieve the patients' symptoms. All patients were seen in follow-up for physical examination and completed a questionnaire by an independent examiner. Follow-up of the patients was 26 months (range 12-59 months). Follow-up data were available on 45 of the 51 enrolled. The patients were divided as follows: 20 patients were treated with total coccygectomy and 25 patients were treated with injection therapy. RESULTS: Of those treated operatively, 18 patients (90%) felt improved and were satisfied with the procedure. Two patients felt their symptoms to be unchanged and were dissatisfied. Postoperative complications included seven wound problems: four superficial infections and three patients with persistent drainage. All resolved with local wound care and oral antibiotics. No further surgery was necessary. There were no bowel injuries and no reports of sphincter problems. Of those treated with injections, 5 of the 25 (20%) felt improvement and were satisfied. Sixteen (64%) were not improved, and four (16%) felt worse. Five (20%) eventually were treated with coccygectomy, four with satisfactory relief in symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the potential for wound problems, coccygectomy for relief of coccygodynia can be a safe and effective treatment option with a high patient satisfaction rate. Wound closure and postoperative wound care are of utmost importance.
机译:目的:目前很少有资料比较球cc痛的外科手术和非手术治疗。我们试图回顾性地回顾我们与球囊切除术相比较的经验,以减轻球虫后遗症的影响,以确定成功率和患者满意度并确定并发症。方法:从1993年3月至2002年1月,对51例诊断为球后痛的患者进行了评估。所有患者在坐诊时都抱怨疼痛,并且在体检时对尾骨的内外触诊有局部疼痛。非手术治疗(药物,垫子,疗法)未能缓解患者的症状。所有患者均接受随访以进行身体检查,并由一名独立检查员填写了调查表。患者的随访时间为26个月(范围12-59个月)。已有51位参与者中的45位获得了随访数据。将患者分为以下几类:20例行全髋关节切除术治疗,25例进行注射疗法治疗。结果:在接受手术治疗的患者中,有18例患者(90%)感到好转,并对手术感到满意。两名患者感到症状没有改变并且不满意。术后并发症包括七个伤口问题:四个浅表感染和三个持续引流患者。所有这些都可以通过局部伤口护理和口服抗生素解决。无需进一步手术。没有肠损伤,也没有括约肌问题的报道。在接受注射治疗的患者中,有25人中有5人(占20%)感到好转并感到满意。 16例(64%)没有改善,4例(16%)感到更糟。最终有5例(20%)接受了球囊切除术,其中4例症状缓解。结论:尽管存在伤口问题的可能性,但通过球囊切除术缓解球虫后遗症可以是一种安全有效的治疗方案,患者满意度高。伤口闭合和术后伤口护理至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号