首页> 外文期刊>Clinical medicine: journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London >Now I know what I don't know: How to reform the foundation years to fit 21st century medicine
【24h】

Now I know what I don't know: How to reform the foundation years to fit 21st century medicine

机译:现在我知道了我所不知道的:如何改革基础年以适应21世纪医学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Editor - Laura Watts makes some good points in her critique of the UK Foundation Programme (Clin Med April 2013 ppl63-5). Her proposal that there should be more flexibility in the choice of placements in the second year, to allow better preparation for subsequent specialty applications, is already in place in the West Midlands, where all foundation year (FY) doctors select their second year programme during March of their FY1 year and compete for popular rotations through evidence of their engagement in the programme with their ePortfolios.1 In 2012 and 2013, all 570 FY1 doctors in the West Midlands deanery responded to a survey on the principal and the process of this system. Two-thirds consistently state that they prefer this uncoupled 2-year programme to a fixed 2-year programme.
机译:编辑-劳拉·沃茨(Laura Watts)在对英国基金会计划的评论中提出了一些好的观点(《临床医学》,2013年4月,第63-5页)。她的建议是在西米德兰兹郡已经提出在第二年的安置选择中应该有更大的灵活性,以便为后续的特殊应用做更好的准备,那里所有的基础年(FY)医生都会在第二年选择他们的第二年计划。他们在FY1的三月,并通过证据证明他们与ePortfolios参与了该计划。1在2012和2013年,西米德兰兹郡的570名FY1医生均对该系统的原理和过程进行了调查。 。三分之二的受访者一致表示,他们更喜欢这种无耦合的2年计划,而不是固定的2年计划。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号