首页> 外文期刊>Journal of speech, language, and hearing research: JSLHR >Preferred and minimum acceptable listening levels for musicians while using floor and in-ear monitors.
【24h】

Preferred and minimum acceptable listening levels for musicians while using floor and in-ear monitors.

机译:音乐家在使用落地式和入耳式监听器时的首选和最低可接受的收听水平。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: This study examined the impact that changing on-stage music and crowd noise levels during musical performance had on preferred listening levels (PLLs) and minimum acceptable listening levels (MALLs) across both floor and in-ear monitors. METHOD: Participants for this study were 23- to 48-year-old musicians, with and without hearing loss, who had 10 years of musical training or comparable professional experience. For this study, PLLs and MALLs were established for the musician's own voice, whereas the levels of other onstage musical signals were systematically varied. PLLs for in-ear monitors were found at significantly lower levels than for floor monitors (approximately 0.6 dB). RESULTS: PLLs for in-ear monitors were found at significantly lower levels than for floor monitors (approximately 0.6 dB). However, despite large spectral differences, PLLs across the 2 monitor types were small enough that the same recommended exposure time would be advocated based on National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and Occupational Safety and Health Administration recommendations. MALL data also indicated significantly lower levels (approximately 6.0 dB) when musicians were using in-ear monitors in comparison to floor monitors. CONCLUSION: The much larger difference suggests that musicians' risk of noise exposure may be reduced by the use of in-ear monitors. However, given the similar PLL results and known monitor output levels, proper counseling would likely be required before this potential advantage would be realized.
机译:目的:本研究探讨了在音乐表演过程中舞台音乐和人群噪音水平的变化对落地式和入耳式监听器的首选收听水平(PLL)和最低可接受收听水平(MALL)的影响。方法:本研究的参与者为23至48岁的有或没有听力损失的音乐家,他们接受了10年的音乐训练或相当的专业经验。在本研究中,针对音乐家自己的声音建立了PLL和MALL,而其他舞台上音乐信号的电平则系统地变化。入耳式监听器的PLL的水平明显低于落地式监听器的PLL(约0.6 dB)。结果:入耳式监听器的PLL的水平明显低于落地式监听器的PLL(约0.6 dB)。但是,尽管频谱差异很大,但两种监视器类型的PLL足够小,以至于根据美国国家职业安全与健康研究所和美国职业安全与卫生管理局的建议,建议使用相同的建议暴露时间。 MALL数据还表明,与落地式监听器相比,音乐家使用入耳式监听器时的电平要低得多(约6.0 dB)。结论:更大的差异表明,使用入耳式监听器可以降低音乐家的噪音风险。但是,鉴于类似的PLL结果和已知的监视器输出电平,在实现这一潜在优势之前,可能需要适当的咨询。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号