【24h】

Rocket scientists need not apply

机译:火箭科学家不需要申请

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Editor - We wholeheartedly agree with your recent editorial.1 Like the hospitals studied by Barton et a/2 we fortunately have few serious medication incidents (mainly due to pharmacy intervention), but a good deal of 'low level crime' in terms of legibility and allergy documentation, in addition to other areas. The causes are varied. Clinician training in practical pharmacology (one to two years part time versus five years) is minimal compared to hospital pharmacists and drug knowledge is limited. A recent survey of our trainee doctors showed that 8/44 did not realise Tazocin was a penicillin and 7/44 thought meropenem was. Similar problems have arisen with Timentin. To compound the issue, only 10/44 trainees said that their consultants checked the drug chart on a ward round 'nearly all the time' or 'all the time'. Unfortunately, our nursing colleagues are often the healthcare professionals disciplined for prescribing errors.
机译:编辑-我们完全同意您最近的社论。1像Barton等人研究过的医院a / 2一样,幸运的是,几乎没有严重的药物事件(主要是由于药房的干预),但是就易读性而言,有很多“低级犯罪”以及其他方面的过敏文档。原因多种多样。与医院药师相比,临床药师对实用药理学的培训(非全日制为一至两年,而五年为半数),并且药物知识有限。最近对我们的见习医生进行的一项调查显示,8/44并未意识到他佐辛是一种青霉素,而7/44则认为美洛培南是青霉素。 Timentin也出现了类似的问题。使问题更加复杂的是,只有10/44的受训者说,他们的顾问“几乎一直”或“一直”在病房里检查毒品图表。不幸的是,我们的护理同事经常是因处方错误而受到训练的医疗专业人员。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号