首页> 外文期刊>Journal of sleep research >Driver sleepiness and individual differences in preferences for countermeasures.
【24h】

Driver sleepiness and individual differences in preferences for countermeasures.

机译:驾驶员嗜睡和个人偏好对策的差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of the present national questionnaire study was to relate the use of sleepiness countermeasures among drivers to possible explanatory factors such as age, sex, education, professional driving, being a shift worker, having experience of sleepy driving, sleep-related crashes, problems with sleep and sleepiness in general and sleep length during working days. Also the attitude to countermeasures related to information or driver support system was studied. A random sample of 3041 persons was drawn from the national register of vehicle owners. The response rate was 62%. The most common countermeasures were to stop to take a walk (54%), turn on the radio/stereo (52%), open a window (47%), drink coffee (45%) and to ask passengers to engage in conversation (35%). Logistic regression analysis showed that counteracting sleepiness with a nap (a presumably efficient method) was practiced by those with experience of sleep-related crashes or of driving during severe sleepiness, as well as by professional drivers, males and drivers aged 46-64 years. The most endorsed means of information to the driver about sleepiness was in-car monitoring of driving performance providing drivers with information on bad or unsafe driving. This preference was related to experience of sleepy driving, not being a professional driver and male gender. Four clusters of behaviours were identified: alertness-enhancing activity while driving (A), stopping the car (S), taking a nap (N) and ingesting coffee or other sources of caffeine (C) (energy drinks, caffeine tablets). The participants were grouped according to their use of any of the four categories of countermeasures. The most common cluster was those who used activity, as well as stopping and drinking caffeine.
机译:当前国家问卷调查的目的是将驾驶员对困倦的应对措施的使用与可能的解释性因素相关,例如年龄,性别,教育程度,专业驾驶,轮班工作,有困倦驾驶经验,与睡眠有关的撞车,问题一般的睡眠和嗜睡以及工作日的睡眠时间。还研究了对与信息或驾驶员支持系统有关的对策的态度。从国家车主登记册中随机抽取3041人。回应率为62%。最常见的对策是停止散步(54%),打开收音机/立体声(52%),打开窗户(47%),喝咖啡(45%),并要求乘客进行交谈( 35%)。 Logistic回归分析表明,有与睡眠相关的事故或严重嗜睡过程中驾驶的经验丰富的人,以及职业驾驶员,男性和46-64岁的驾驶员,都采取了午睡(大概有效的方法)来抵消嗜睡。向驾驶员提供的有关困倦的最常用信息是对驾驶性能进行车内监视,从而为驾驶员提供有关不良或不安全驾驶的信息。这种偏爱与困倦驾驶经验有关,不是专业驾驶员和男性。确定了四类行为:驾驶时提高警觉性(A),停车(S),小睡(N)和摄入咖啡或其他咖啡因(C)(能量饮料,咖啡因片剂)。根据参加者对这四类对策的使用情况将他们分组。最常见的人群是那些从事活动以及停止和喝咖啡因的人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号