【24h】

On the Existence of K. Meyl's Scalar Waves

机译:关于梅尔标量波的存在

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the fall of 2000, several talks were delivered by K. Meyl. These talks described his theory of so-called Tesla's scalar waves (e.g., in Meyl ["Scalar Waves..." (2000) and "Longitudinalwellen-Experiment..." (2000)], and on his Web site). In the following article, we shall mainly discussed the theoretical part of there publications, although the experimental part would deserve a detailed discussion in its own right. The scalar wave, according to Meyl, is an irrotational electric vector solution E of the homogeneous wave equation having non-vanishing sources. However, and this is Meyl's logical flaw, it is not the homogeneous wave equation but Maxwell's equations that are the actual starting point of any theory of electromagnetic waves. And, as will be seen see in Section 1, the homogeneous wave equation is valid only in vacuum and in its natural generalization, in homogeneous materials without free charges and currents, while in other cases the inhomogeneous wave equation would apply. So in Section 2, our next immediate result is that Meyl's source conditions are inconsistent with the material properties. Hence, we have to assume the vector field E to be source free. But— as will be shown further for this case—Maxwell's equations do not admit other than trivial scalar waves of the Meyl type, since only time- independent solutions are admissible. Under those conditions, the only permissible conclusion is that Meyl's scalar waves do not exist. At the end of his talks (Meyl, "Scalar Waves..." [2000] and "Longitudinalwellen-Experiment..." [2000]), Meyl makes another remarkable assertion, which we shall discuss in Section 3. Meyl claims to have generated 'vortex' solutions that propagate faster than light. But for solutions of the homogeneous wave equation, this would clearly contradict a well-known theorem of the mathematical theory of the wave equation. In addition, Meyl's proof for his claim will turn out to be a simple flaw of thinking.
机译:在2000年秋天,K。Meyl发表了几场演讲。这些谈话在他的网站上描述了他所谓的特斯拉标量波的理论(例如,Meyl [“ Scalar Waves ...”(2000年)和“ Longitudinalwellen-Experiment ...”(2000年)]。在下面的文章中,我们将主要讨论那里出版物的理论部分,尽管实验部分本身应该进行详细的讨论。根据Meyl,标量波是具有不消失源的齐次波动方程的无旋电矢量解E。但是,这是Meyl的逻辑缺陷,并不是任何均匀波方程,而是Maxwell方程才是任何电磁波理论的实际出发点。而且,正如在第1节中所见,齐次波动方程仅在真空中及其自然概括中有效,在没有自由电荷和电流的均质材料中有效,而在其他情况下,将应用不均匀波动方程。因此,在第2节中,我们的下一个直接结果是Meyl的来源条件与材料特性不一致。因此,我们必须假设向量场E是无源的。但是,正如在这种情况下将进一步显示的那样,麦克斯韦方程组除了Meyl类型的平凡标量波之外,不接受其他条件,因为仅允许与时间无关的解决方案。在这些条件下,唯一可以得出的结论是,梅尔的标量波不存在。在演讲结束时(Meyl,“标量波...” [2000]和“ Longitudinalwellen-Experiment ...” [2000]),Meyl提出了另一个引人注目的断言,我们将在第3节中进行讨论。已经产生了比光传播快的“涡旋”解。但是对于齐次波动方程的解,这显然与波动方程的数学理论的一个著名定理矛盾。另外,梅伊尔关于他的主张的证据将证明是思想上的一个简单缺陷。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号