【24h】

The bell should toll for the linear no-threshold model

机译:响铃应为线性无阈值模型收费

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The linear no-threshold (LNT) model has been a convenient tool in the practice of radiation protection but it is not supported by scientific data at doses less than about 100 mSv or at chronic dose rates up to at least 200 mSv yr(-1). Radiation protection practices based on the LNT model yield no demonstrable benefits to health when applied at lower annual doses. The assumption that such exposures are harmful may not even be conservative and has helped to foster an unwarranted fear of low-level radiation.For its new recommendations, to be issued probably in 2005, the ICRP has said that it expects to continue the application of the LNT model `above a few millisieverts per year'. National societies for radiation protection may wish to consider the need to lobby the ICRP, through the auspices of IRPA, to further relax adherence to the LNT assumption-up to `a few tens of millisieverts per year'.
机译:线性无阈值(LNT)模型在辐射防护实践中是一种方便的工具,但是在剂量小于约100 mSv或慢性剂量率至少为200 mSv yr(-1)时,科学数据不支持该模型。 )。当以较低的年剂量使用时,基于LNT模型的辐射防护实践不会对健康产生明显的好处。关于此类照射有害的假设甚至可能不是保守的,并有助于加剧人们对低辐射的担忧。对于可能在2005年发布的新建议,国际放射防护委员会表示希望继续应用该标准。 LNT模式“每年几毫西弗”。全国辐射防护协会不妨考虑有必要通过IRPA的主持游说ICRP,以进一步放宽对LNT假设的遵守,即“每年几十毫西弗特”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号