首页> 外文期刊>Clinical medicine: journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London >Is the NHS willing to help clinicians and patients reduce uncertainties about the effects of treatments?
【24h】

Is the NHS willing to help clinicians and patients reduce uncertainties about the effects of treatments?

机译:NHS是否愿意帮助临床医生和患者减少治疗效果的不确定性?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Uncertainty is an inevitable component of clinical practice. Clinicians have a responsibility to minimise it by keeping up-to-date with current knowledge: but what is the responsibility of individual clinicians in reducing collective uncertainty? In all fields of medicine there are important questions relevant to both patients and clinicians, which can be answered only by clinical research. Unfortunately, much of the clinical research that attracts funding does not address the questions that both patients and clinicians regard as important. Furthermore, although the NHS has a proud record of innovation and clinical research, recent changes are jeopardising the ability and willingness of NHS clinicians to continue undertaking such work. A combination of increased bureaucracy in obtaining research ethics and local research and development (R&D) governance approval and the pressures on management to deliver service targets threaten to strangle research by NHS clinicians. Policy makers argue for informed patient choice, modernisation and improved quality. It is not in the interest of patients when research designed to address important therapeutic uncertainties is seen as an optional extra, rather than an intrinsic element of a health service interested in improving quality. The NHS needs to listen to its users, ie the patients, and to its clinical staff, and to encourage them to engage in research to help reduce those uncertainties.
机译:不确定性是临床实践中不可避免的组成部分。临床医生有责任通过保持最新知识来将其最小化:但是,每个临床医生在减少集体不确定性方面的责任是什么?在医学的所有领域,都有与患者和临床医生都相关的重要问题,只有通过临床研究才能回答。不幸的是,许多吸引资金的临床研究并未解决患者和临床医生都认为重要的问题。此外,尽管NHS在创新和临床研究方面拥有骄人的记录,但最近的变化正在危及NHS临床医生继续开展此类工作的能力和意愿。官僚机构在获得研究伦理和地方研发(R&D)治理批准方面的不断增加,以及管理层交付服务目标的压力,这些都威胁着NHS临床医生的研究工作。决策者主张明智的患者选择,现代化和提高质量。当旨在解决重要治疗不确定性的研究被视为可选的额外项目,而不是对提高质量感兴趣的卫生服务的内在要素时,这不符合患者的利益。 NHS需要倾听用户(即患者)及其临床人员的意见,并鼓励他们参与研究以帮助减少这些不确定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号