【24h】

Investigation of the patient with pleural effusion.

机译:胸腔积液患者的调查。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Editor - Rahman and Munawar's paper on investigating the patient with pleural effusion (Clin Med April 2009 pp 174-8) made no mention of the utility of quantifying pleural fluid adenosine deaminase (ADA) as a diagnostic parameter. Assay of ADA is simple and inexpensive, coupled with a relatively high sensitivity and specificity in identifying tuberculous pleuritis, enhanced further when the effusion in question is richly lymphocytic. While the positive predictive value of ADA may be lowered by its use in areas of low tuberculosis (TB) prevalence, its negative predictive value should remain unaffected, retaining its overall value as a subsidiary 'rule out' test for suspected TB pleural disease. Furthermore, ADA levels falling below the diagnostic cut-off threshold (around 40 U/l) have been shown to virtually exclude TB as a cause of pleural effusion even when the collection is lymphocytic. We suspect that many physicians continue to find the analysis of ADA useful in the setting of suspected TB pleural sepsis while eagerly awaiting the emergence of newer immune-based tests of pleural fluid.
机译:编辑-Rahman和Munawar的关于调查胸腔积液患者的论文(Clin Med,2009年4月,第174-8页)没有提及定量胸水腺苷脱氨酶(ADA)作为诊断参数的实用性。 ADA的测定既简单又便宜,并且在鉴定结核性胸膜炎时具有相对较高的灵敏度和特异性,当所讨论的积液富含淋巴细胞时,这种测定会进一步提高。虽然在低结核病(TB)患病率地区使用ADA可能会降低ADA的阳性预测值,但其阴性预测值应保持不受影响,并保留其总体价值作为可疑TB胸膜疾病的辅助“排除”测试。此外,ADA水平下降到低于诊断临界值(大约40 U / l)已被证明实际上排除了TB作为胸腔积液的原因,即使收集的是淋巴细胞。我们怀疑许多医生在急切等待新的基于免疫的胸膜液检查出现的同时,继续发现对可疑结核性胸膜脓毒症有用的ADA分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号