...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery: JPRAS >Comparison of lymphoscintigraphy and indocyanine green lymphography for the diagnosis of extremity lymphoedema
【24h】

Comparison of lymphoscintigraphy and indocyanine green lymphography for the diagnosis of extremity lymphoedema

机译:淋巴造影与吲哚菁绿淋巴造影在四肢淋巴水肿诊断中的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Lymphoscintigraphy is the gold-standard examination for extremity lymphoedema. Indocyanine green lymphography may be useful for diagnosis as well. We compared the utility of these two examination methods for patients with suspected extremity lymphoedema and for those in whom surgical treatment of lymphoedema was under consideration. Methods: A total of 169 extremities with lymphoedema secondary to lymph node dissection and 65 extremities with idiopathic oedema (suspected primary lymphoedema) were evaluated; the utility of indocyanine green lymphography for diagnosis was compared with lymphoscintigraphy. Regression analysis between lymphoscintigraphy type and indocyanine green lymphography stage was conducted in the secondary lymphoedema group. Results: In secondary oedema, the sensitivity of indocyanine green lymphography, compared with lymphoscintigraphy, was 0.972, the specificity was 0.548 and the accuracy was 0.816. When patients with lymphoscintigraphy type I and indocyanine green lymphography stage I were regarded as negative, the sensitivity of the indocyanine green lymphography was 0.978, the specificity was 0.925 and the accuracy was 0.953. There was a significant positive correlation between the lymphoscintigraphy type and the indocyanine green lymphography stage. In idiopathic oedema, the sensitivity of indocyanine green lymphography was 0.974, the specificity was 0.778 and the accuracy was 0.892. Conclusion: In secondary lymphoedema, earlier and less severe dysfunction could be detected by indocyanine green lymphography. Indocyanine green lymphography is recommended to determine patients' suitability for lymphaticovenular anastomosis, because the diagnostic ability of the test and its evaluation capability for disease severity is similar to lymphoscintigraphy but with less invasiveness and a lower cost. To detect primary lymphoedema, indocyanine green lymphography should be used first as a screening examination; when the results are positive, lymphoscintigraphy is useful to obtain further information.
机译:背景:淋巴显像是四肢淋巴水肿的金标准检查。吲哚菁绿淋巴造影也可能对诊断有用。我们比较了这两种检查方法在疑似肢端淋巴水肿患者和正在考虑手术治疗淋巴水肿的患者中的效用。方法:共评估169例继发于淋巴结清扫的淋巴水肿和65例患有特发性水肿(疑似原发性淋巴水肿)的肢体。将吲哚菁绿淋巴造影在诊断中的效用与淋巴闪烁显像进行了比较。在继发性淋巴水肿组中,进行了淋巴闪烁显像类型与吲哚菁绿淋巴造影阶段之间的回归分析。结果:在继发性水肿中,吲哚菁绿淋巴造影的敏感性与淋巴闪烁显像法相比为0.972,特异性为0.548,准确度为0.816。当I型淋巴闪烁显像和吲哚菁绿淋巴结I期患者为阴性时,吲哚菁绿淋巴结造影的敏感性为0.978,特异性为0.925,准确度为0.953。淋巴活检的类型与吲哚菁绿淋巴分期之间存在显着的正相关。在特发性水肿中,吲哚菁绿淋巴造影的敏感性为0.974,特异性为0.778,准确度为0.892。结论:在继发性淋巴水肿中,吲哚菁绿淋巴造影可发现较轻和较轻的功能障碍。建议使用吲哚菁绿淋巴摄影术来确定患者是否适合进行淋巴管静脉吻合术,因为该测试的诊断能力及其对疾病严重程度的评估能力与淋巴闪烁成像相似,但侵入性较小且成本较低。为了检测原发性淋巴水肿,应首先使用吲哚菁绿淋巴造影作为筛查检查;当结果为阳性时,淋巴显像有助于获取更多信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号