首页> 外文期刊>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery: JPRAS >Outcome analysis of 244 consecutive flaps for managing complex groin wounds
【24h】

Outcome analysis of 244 consecutive flaps for managing complex groin wounds

机译:244个连续皮瓣治疗复杂腹股沟伤口的结果分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background Complex groin wounds present a significant challenge to the reconstructive surgeon. We present a large experience of flaps for managing complex groin wounds. The purpose of our study was to assess outcomes with respect to flap selection and indication (prophylactic versus salvage). Patients and methods A retrospective review of all patients receiving flaps for complex groin wounds between 2005 and 2011 was performed. Two types of procedures were evaluated: prophylactic muscle flaps (PMFs) and salvage flaps. We performed an outcome analysis of complications based on flap timing and selection. Results A total of 244 flaps were performed during the study period: 146 flaps for salvage and 98 for prophylaxis. Flaps included: sartorius muscle flap (SMF) (N = 132), rectus femoris flap (RFF) (N = 99), and antero-lateral thigh (ALT) (N = 13). Salvaged wounds had higher rates of major wound dehiscence compared to prophylactic wounds (P = 0.002). The SMF (N = 132) and RFF (N = 99) cohorts were similar with respect to patient and operative characteristics, however, the RFF cohort tended to be obese (P = 0.002), used for salvage (P = 0.0005), endarterectomy procedures (P = 0.018), and culture positive wounds (P = 0.09). Major limb related complications (graft loss, limb loss, and reoperation) were significantly lower in the RFF group (P = 0.03). Conclusions Muscle flaps for complex groin wounds can be safely performed with excellent outcomes. We suggest use of the SMF in the prophylactic setting and for smaller salvage wounds. The RFF may be better suited to address larger, more complex wounds. PMFs in select, high-risk patients optimize wound healing relative to patients undergoing groin wound salvage. Level of evidence Prognostic/risk category, level III.
机译:背景复杂的腹股沟伤口对重建外科医师提出了重大挑战。我们展示了处理复杂腹股沟伤口的皮瓣的丰富经验。我们研究的目的是评估与皮瓣选择和适应症(预防性与挽救性)有关的预后。患者和方法对2005年至2011年间接受腹股沟皮瓣修复复杂腹股沟伤口的所有患者进行了回顾性研究。评价了两种类型的程序:预防性肌皮瓣(PMF)和抢救皮瓣。我们根据皮瓣的时机和选择对并发症进行了结局分析。结果在研究期间共进行了244个皮瓣:146个皮瓣用于挽救,98个皮瓣用于预防。皮瓣包括:睑肌皮瓣(SMF)(N = 132),股直肌皮瓣(RFF)(N = 99)和大腿前外侧(ALT)(N = 13)。与预防性伤口相比,挽救性伤口的主要伤口裂开率更高(P = 0.002)。 SMF(N = 132)和RFF(N = 99)队列在患者和手术特征方面相似,但是,RFF队列倾向于肥胖(P = 0.002),用于挽救(P = 0.0005),内膜切除术程序(P = 0.018)和培养阳性伤口(P = 0.09)。 RFF组患肢的主要并发症(移植物丢失,肢体丢失和再次手术)显着降低(P = 0.03)。结论复杂腹股沟伤口的肌肉瓣可以安全地进行,并具有良好的效果。我们建议在预防环境中使用SMF并用于较小的抢救伤口。 RFF可能更适合解决更大,更复杂的伤口。相对于腹股沟伤口抢救患者,精选的高风险患者的PMF可优化伤口愈合。证据级别预后/风险类别,级别III。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号