首页> 外文期刊>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery: JPRAS >A new approach to microneurovascular TRAM-flap breast reconstruction--a pilot study.
【24h】

A new approach to microneurovascular TRAM-flap breast reconstruction--a pilot study.

机译:微神经血管TRAM皮瓣乳房重建的新方法-一项初步研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: The aims of the present study were to investigate whether microneurovascular breast reconstruction with a free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap and nerve repair with nerves other than ThIV and ThXI improve sensory recovery of the breast compared to traditional free TRAM flap without nerve repair, and which nerve is optimal for the neural anastomosis of the flap. METHODS: Twenty breast cancer patients underwent breast reconstruction with a free TRAM flap and nerve repair (neuro-TRAM) with the best available nerve from the axillary area and 20 control patients had traditional free TRAM flap without nerve repair (standard-TRAM). Neurorrhaphy was done by end-to-end or end-to-side techniques. Sensory and quantitative sensory testings (QST) were performed. Patient satisfaction was evaluated by a clinical questionnaire. The results were analysed by Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 32 months for the neuro-TRAM, and 54 months for the standard-TRAM group. Sensory outcome was better in the neuro-TRAM group (sensory score 45% of that of the contralateral breast) than in the standard-TRAM group (26% of the contralateral side). The median (quartiles) of total scores in the operated breasts was 12.9 (9.5-19.2) in neuro-TRAM group and 8.1 (3.5-10.7) in standard-TRAM group (Mann-Whitney Test (p=0.006)). All nerves available in the thoracic and axillary areas and both of the anastomosis techniques were successful in the reinnervation procedure. Nerve repair did not influence overall patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that any nerve repair results in improved sensory recovery after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Any nerve available for anastomosis in the recipient site is potentially able to provide moderately good cutaneous sensibility to the TRAM-breast.
机译:背景:本研究的目的是调查与无神经的传统游离TRAM皮瓣相比,用游离的腹直肌横纹肌皮(TRAM)皮瓣和用ThIV和ThXI以外的神经进行神经修复的微神经血管乳房重建术是否能改善乳房的感觉恢复。修复,哪条神经最适合皮瓣的神经吻合。方法:20例乳腺癌患者接受了游离TRAM皮瓣和神经修复(neuro-TRAM)的乳房再造术,其中腋窝区域可获得最佳神经,而20例对照患者进行了传统的游离TRAM皮瓣无神经修复(标准TRAM)。神经止血是通过端对端或端对端技术进行的。进行了感官和定量感官测试(QST)。通过临床问卷评估患者满意度。通过Mann-Whitney检验分析结果。结果:神经TRAM平均随访32个月,标准TRAM组平均随访54个月。神经-TRAM组的感觉结果(对侧乳腺的感觉分数为45%)比标准-TRAM组(对侧的26%)更好。神经-TRAM组的手术乳房总分的中位数(四分位数)为12.9(9.5-19.2),标准TRAM组的总得分中位数(四分位数)为8.1(3.5-10.7)(Mann-Whitney检验(p = 0.006))。胸和腋窝区域所有可用的神经以及两种吻合技术均在神经支配过程中获得成功。神经修复未影响整体患者满意度。结论:这项研究表明,任何神经修复均可改善TRAM皮瓣乳房重建术后的感觉恢复。受体部位可用于吻合的任何神经都可能为TRAM乳房提供适度良好的皮肤敏感性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号