...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Rural Studies >Contesting the neoliberal project for agriculture: productivist and multifunctional trajectories in the European Union and Australia.
【24h】

Contesting the neoliberal project for agriculture: productivist and multifunctional trajectories in the European Union and Australia.

机译:挑战新自由主义农业计划:欧盟和澳大利亚的生产主义和多功能轨迹。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The liberalisation of agricultural trade is strongly contested as an international policy project. In the context of the current World Trade Organisation (WTO) Doha trade round, concerns revolve around the implications of freer trade for rural livelihoods and environments. Analysis of this complex and morally charged issue offers important insights into the nature of resistance to the neoliberal agenda. This resistance has been expressed in terms of perceived threats to the 'multifunctionality' of agriculture and its ability to provide public environmental and social benefits. We focus specifically on Australia and the European Union (EU), key players in the WTO process but diametrically opposed in their embrace of, or resistance to, agricultural neoliberalisation. While the EU has sought to maintain trade barriers in order to protect both marginal areas and the market advantages derived from a heavily-subsidised, productivist agriculture, Australia relies on 'competitive productivism' - unsubsidised, highly productive agriculture - to win markets. There is nevertheless evidence that the compatibility of market rule with agri-environmental (and, to a lesser extent, social) sustainability is being contested in both Australia and the EU, particularly at the regional scale. The nature and terms of this contestation are different, however, given the radically divergent macro-economic and socio-political contexts in which it is being framed. The debate about the socio-environmental implications of market opening within the agriculturally protectionist environment of the EU is largely anticipatory and risk-averting, while in the already market-exposed Australian context it is increasingly compensatory and harm-minimising. In this paper, we argue that neoliberalisation as a policy agenda is reshaped in different states and regions through processes of resistance and accommodation arising from particular geographical, historical, political and institutional contexts, and as a response to crises.
机译:农产品贸易自由化是一项国际政策项目,备受争议。在当前的世界贸易组织(WTO)多哈贸易回合中,人们的关注点围绕自由贸易对农村生计和环境的影响。对这个复杂的,道德上带有争议的问题的分析提供了对新自由主义议程的抵抗性质的重要见解。这种抵制以对农业“多功能性”的威胁及其提供公共环境和社会效益的能力来表示。我们特别关注WTO进程中的主要参与者澳大利亚和欧盟(EU),但在拥抱或抵制农业新自由化方面却截然相反。欧盟一直试图维持贸易壁垒,以保护边际地区和由大量补贴的生产主义农业带来的市场优势,而澳大利亚则依靠“竞争性生产主义”(无补贴,高生产率的农业)来赢得市场。然而,有证据表明,澳大利亚和欧盟,尤其是在区域范围内,都在争辩市场规则与农业环境(在较小程度上是社会)可持续性的兼容性。但是,考虑到这场竞赛的本质和条件截然不同,因此这场竞赛的性质和条件是不同的。关于在欧盟的农业保护主义环境下开放市场的社会环境影响的辩论在很大程度上是预期和风险平均的,而在已经暴露于市场的澳大利亚背景下,它的补偿性和危害性却越来越小。在本文中,我们认为,新自由主义作为政策议程在不同的州和地区通过特定的地理,历史,政治和制度环境以及对危机的反应而产生的抵制和适应过程得以重塑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号