首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Rural Health >Strength of Tobacco Control in Rural Communities
【24h】

Strength of Tobacco Control in Rural Communities

机译:农村社区的控烟力度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: This study aimed to: (a) describe the Strength of Tobacco Control (SoTC) capacity, efforts and resources in rural communities, and (b) examine the relationships between SoTC scores and sociodemographic, political, and health-ranking variables. Methods: Data were collected during the baseline preintervention phase of a community-based randomized, controlled trial. Rural counties were selected using stratified random sampling (n = 39). Key informant interviews were employed. The SoTC, originally developed and tested with states, was adapted to a county-level measure assessing capacity, efforts, and resources. Univariate analysis and bivariate correlations assessed the SoTC total score and construct scores, as well as their relationships. Multiple regression examined the relationships of county-level sociodemographic, political, and health-ranking variables with SoTC total and construct scores. Findings: County population size was positively correlated with capacity (r = 0.44; P < .01), efforts (r = 0.54; P= .01), and SoTC total score (r = 0.51; P < .01). Communities with more resources for tobacco control had better overall county health rankings (r = .43; P < .01). With population size, percent Caucasian, tobacco production, and smoking prevalence as potential predictors of SoTC total score, only population size was significant. Conclusions: SoTC scores may be useful in determining local tobacco control efforts and appropriate planning for additional public health interventions and resources. Larger rural communities were more likely to have strong tobacco control programs than smaller communities. Smaller rural communities may need to be targeted for training and technical assistance. Leadership development and allocation of resources are needed in all rural communities to address disparities in tobacco use and tobacco control policies.
机译:目的:本研究旨在:(a)描述农村社区的烟草控制(SoTC)能力,工作和资源,以及(b)研究SoTC得分与社会人口统计学,政治和健康排名变量之间的关系。方法:在一项基于社区的随机对照试验的基线干预前阶段收集数据。使用分层随机抽样(n = 39)选择农村县。聘请了关键线人访谈。 SoTC最初是由各州开发和测试的,后来被改编为县级评估能力,工作和资源的措施。单变量分析和双变量相关性评估了SoTC总得分和结构得分以及它们之间的关系。多元回归检验了县级社会人口统计学,政治和健康排名变量与SoTC总分和结构得分的关系。结果:县人口规模与能力(r = 0.44; P <.01),工作量(r = 0.54; P = .01)和SoTC总得分(r = 0.51; P <.01)呈正相关。拥有更多烟草控制资源的社区在县级卫生方面总体排名较高(r = .43; P <.01)。人口规模,高加索人百分比,烟草生产和吸烟率是SoTC总得分的潜在预测指标,只有人口规模才有意义。结论:SoTC评分可能有助于确定当地的控烟工作以及适当的计划其他公共卫生干预措施和资源。与较小的社区相比,较大的农村社区更有可能实施强有力的烟草控制计划。较小的农村社区可能需要成为培训和技术援助的对象。所有农村社区都需要领导能力发展和资源分配,以解决烟草使用和烟草控制政策方面的差距。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号