...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of refractive surgery >Central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, and pupil diameter measurements using Visante OCT, Orbscan, and Pentacam.
【24h】

Central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, and pupil diameter measurements using Visante OCT, Orbscan, and Pentacam.

机译:使用Visante OCT,Orbscan和Pentacam测量中央角膜厚度,前房深度和瞳孔直径。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate the agreement among three different optical methods in measuring anterior chamber depth (ACD), central corneal thickness (CCT), and pupil diameter. METHODS: One hundred eyes of 50 healthy patients (25 men, 25 women) were enrolled in the study. Mean patient age was 25 years (range: 21 to 32 years). Exclusion criteria were history of any intraocular or corneal surgery, contact lens wear, corneal anomalies, and spherical refraction >5.00 diopters (D) or cylindrical refraction >2.00 D. All measurements were done by the same operator under mesopic light conditions and repeated using three different optical methods: Visante optical coherence tomography (OCT) (Carl Zeiss Meditec), Orbscan (Bausch & Lomb), and Pentacam (Oculus Optikgerate GmbH). RESULTS: Mean CCT as measured by Visante OCT, Orbscan, and Pentacam was 529+/-30.5 microm, 554+/-32.7 microm, and 552+/-29.3 microm, respectively. Mean ACD values were 2.94+/-0.34 mm, 2.84+/-0.33 mm, and 2.98+/-0.33 mm, respectively. Mean pupil diameter measurements were 4.87+/-1.09 mm, 4.0+/-0.67 mm, and 3.05+/-0.59 mm, respectively. The Visante OCT measured CCT thinner and Orbscan measured ACD shallower than the other two methods. All three methods measured pupil diameters significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: This study found some statistically significant but clinically insignificant differences among the optical methods assessed. The differences are small and do not influence decisions for refractive surgery in clinical practice.
机译:目的:评估三种不同的光学方法在测量前房深度(ACD),中央角膜厚度(CCT)和瞳孔直径方面的一致性。方法:本研究纳入了50名健康患者(25名男性,25名女性)的一百只眼。平均患者年龄为25岁(范围:21至32岁)。排除标准为任何眼内或角膜手术史,角膜接触镜佩戴,角膜异常,球面屈光度> 5.00屈光度(D)或柱面屈光度> 2.00D。所有测量均由同一操作员在中视光条件下进行,并重复使用三次不同的光学方法:Visante光学相干断层扫描(OCT)(Carl Zeiss Meditec),Orbscan(Bausch&Lomb)和Pentacam(Oculus Optikgerate GmbH)。结果:通过Visante OCT,Orbscan和Pentacam测量的平均CCT分别为529 +/- 30.5微米,554 +/- 32.7微米和552 +/- 29.3微米。平均ACD值分别为2.94 +/- 0.34 mm,2.84 +/- 0.33 mm和2.98 +/- 0.33 mm。平均瞳孔直径测量值分别为4.87 +/- 1.09 mm,4.0 +/- 0.67 mm和3.05 +/- 0.59 mm。与其他两种方法相比,Visante OCT测得的CCT较薄,Orbscan测得的ACD较浅。三种方法测得的瞳孔直径均显着不同。结论:本研究发现所评估的光学方法之间在统计学上有显着差异,但在临床上无意义。差异很小,并且不会影响临床实践中屈光手术的决策。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号