...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of reconstructive microsurgery >Fasciocutaneous free flaps are more reliable than muscle free flaps in lower limb trauma reconstruction: Experience in a single trauma center
【24h】

Fasciocutaneous free flaps are more reliable than muscle free flaps in lower limb trauma reconstruction: Experience in a single trauma center

机译:在下肢创伤重建中,筋膜外游离皮瓣比肌肉游离皮瓣更可靠:在单个创伤中心的经验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Muscle (M) and fasciocutaneous (FC) free flaps are frequently used options in the reconstruction of traumatic lower limb injuries. The use of one flap over another has remained the topic of controversy in the literature. With a large experience, we sought to evaluate key outcomes of M versus FC free flap reconstructions in lower limb trauma in a single trauma center. Methods A consecutive 7- year review of all free flap reconstructions for lower limb trauma performed at the Royal Melbourne Hospital was conducted. Patient data were prospectively entered into a unit database and retrospectively reviewed. Results One hundred three patients underwent 105 free flap reconstructions (M = 48 and FC = 57) in lower limb trauma. We experienced a rate of 2.9% total flap failures and 11.4% partial flap losses. Total flap failures represented 6.3% M and 0% FC flaps. The partial flap failures included 15.8% of M and 5.3% of FC flaps. Latissimus dorsi (40% of M group) and radial forearm free flaps (67% of FC group) were most commonly used in each group. There was a statistically significant difference between groups in rates of reoperation (M = 44% versus FC = 16%), postoperative infection (M = 38% versus FC = 12%), fracture nonunion (M = 40% versus FC = 21%), and donor site morbidity (M = 25% versus FC = 4%). Nonstatistically significant differences were encountered with higher rates of osteomyelitis (M = 14.6% versus FC = 10.5%), unplanned bone graft (M = 14.6 versus FC = 10.5%), and inability to bear full weight at 1 year (M = 30.2% versus FC = 17.0%) found in the M group. In our cohort, M flaps used for metal coverage resulted in higher rates of reoperation, postoperative infections, and flap loss than FC flaps (M = 61% versus FC = 25%, p < 0.05). Conclusion Statistically higher complication rates in key reliability markers were found in the M free flap group. This study found FC free flaps to be more reliable for reconstruction of lower limb injuries in a major trauma center.
机译:背景肌肉(M)和无筋膜皮肤(FC)的皮瓣是创伤性下肢损伤重建中经常使用的选择。在一个文献中,一个瓣盖在另一个瓣上的使用一直是争议的话题。凭借丰富的经验,我们试图评估单个创伤中心在下肢创伤中进行M与FC游离皮瓣重建的关键结果。方法对皇家墨尔本医院对下肢外伤的所有游离皮瓣重建术进行连续7年的回顾。将患者数据前瞻性地输入单位数据库并进行回顾性审查。结果103例患者在下肢创伤中接受了105例游离皮瓣重建(M = 48和FC = 57)。我们经历了2.9%的总瓣失败率和11.4%的部分瓣丢失率。皮瓣总失败占6.3%M和0%FC皮瓣。部分皮瓣失败包括15.8%的M皮瓣和5.3%的FC皮瓣。背阔肌(M组占40%)和无radial骨前臂皮瓣(FC组占67%)是每组中最常用的。两组之间的再手术率(M = 44%vs FC = 16%),术后感染(M = 38%vs FC = 12%),骨折骨不连(M = 40%vs FC = 21%)在统计学上有显着差异。 )和供体部位发病率(M = 25%vs FC = 4%)。非统计学差异有较高的骨髓炎发生率(M = 14.6%vs FC = 10.5%),计划外植骨(M = 14.6 vs FC = 10.5%)以及在一年内无法承受全部体重(M = 30.2%)相对于FC = 17.0%)。在我们的队列中,用于金属覆盖的M个皮瓣导致的再手术,术后感染和皮瓣丢失率均高于FC皮瓣(M = 61%vs FC = 25%,p <0.05)。结论M游离皮瓣组的关键可靠性指标的并发症发生率在统计学上较高。这项研究发现,无FC皮瓣对于严重创伤中心下肢损伤的重建更为可靠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号