首页> 外文期刊>Journal of psycholinguistic research >Kill the Song-Steal the Show: What Does Distinguish Predicative Metaphors From Decomposable Idioms?
【24h】

Kill the Song-Steal the Show: What Does Distinguish Predicative Metaphors From Decomposable Idioms?

机译:杀死歌曲-表演:将可比喻与可分解习语区分开来是什么?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study examined the semantic processing difference between decomposable idioms and novel predicative metaphors. It was hypothesized that idiom comprehension results from the retrieval of a figurative meaning stored in memory, that metaphor comprehension requires a sense creation process and that this process difference affects the processing time of idiomatic and metaphoric expressions. In the first experiment, participants read sentences containing decomposable idioms, predicative metaphors or control expressions and performed a lexical decision task on figurative targets presented 0, 350, and 500 ms, or 750 after reading. Results demonstrated that idiomatic expressions were processed sooner than metaphoric ones. In the second experiment, participants were asked to assess the meaningfulness of idiomatic, metaphoric and literal expressions after reading a verb prime that belongs to the target phrase (identity priming). The results showed that verb identity priming was stronger for idiomatic expressions than for metaphor ones, indicating different mental representations.
机译:这项研究探讨了可分解习语和新型谓语隐喻之间的语义处理差异。据推测,习语理解是由对存储在存储器中的比喻含义的检索产生的,隐喻理解需要一种意义创造过程,而这一过程差异会影响惯用和隐喻表达的处理时间。在第一个实验中,参与者阅读包含可分解习语,谓语隐喻或控制表达式的句子,并在阅读后0、350和500 ms或750出现的比喻目标上执行词汇决策任务。结果表明,惯用语的表达要比隐喻的表达更快。在第二个实验中,要求参与者在阅读了属于目标短语的动词素数(身份素数)后,评估惯用语,隐喻和文字表达的意义。结果表明,惯用语的动词身份启动比隐喻的动词启动更强,表明不同的心理表征。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号