首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Petroleum Science & Engineering >Wellbore stability analysis and well path optimization based on the breakout width model and Mogi-Coulomb criterion
【24h】

Wellbore stability analysis and well path optimization based on the breakout width model and Mogi-Coulomb criterion

机译:基于压裂宽度模型和Mogi-Coulomb准则的井筒稳定性分析和井道优化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The failure criterion is a very important aspect of the wellbore stability analysis. But the Mohr-Coulomb criterion, a most commonly used failure criterion, is usually too conservative, due to the influence of the intermediate principal stress is not taken into account. Furthermore, the safe mud weight (MW) predicted by the conventional method is usually too high, due to the safe MW is predicted to yield no shear failure around the borehole. To solve the above problems, a semi-analytic model of wellbore stability analysis was proposed based on the stress distribution model, failure criteria and the breakout width model. The Mogi-Coulomb criterion, a new true-triaxial failure criterion, is involved in this semi-analytic model to determine the shear failure. The computational models of the lowest and highest safe MW are derived for different failure mode. The numerical method and flowchart of this semi-analytic model is provided, and a computer program is also developed in Matlab software. The impacts of the failure criteria, stress regimes and breakout width had been systematically analyzed. The optimal well path had been optimized for different stress regimes. The results showed that the lowest safe MW predicted by Mogi-Coulomb criterion is always lower than the Mohr-Coulomb criterion. The most stable drilling direction is along the minimum horizontal stress for the NF and NF-SS stress regimes, while it's along the maximum horizontal stress in the SS, SS-RF and RF stress regimes. If the breakout width model is used, the lowest safe MW is always lower than the traditional method. The optimal well path and the wellbore stability are different between traditional and new methods. The most stable path is always the horizontal and deviated well for the traditional method, instead, it's always the vertical well for this new method, it's more consistent with the actual situation. These results also illustrated that an acceptable breakout is usually allowed to occur in the actual borehole, and the borehole still has enough arc to support the wellbore wall and to prevent collapse accident. Finally, both of the traditional and new methods are applied in the field case studies. The results showed that the lowest safe MW predicted by the integration of the breakout width model and Mogi-Coulomb criterion is closest to the real MW, instead, the lowest safe MW predicted by the traditional methods has exceeded the actual MW. It also illustrated the traditional method is too conservative in predicting wellbore stability, while this new method is more accurate for the integration of the breakout width model and MG-C criterion. This research can provide support to optimize the well path and MW in the drilling practices. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:破坏准则是井筒稳定性分析的一个非常重要的方面。但是,由于不考虑中间主应力的影响,最常用的失效准则Mohr-Coulomb准则通常过于保守。此外,通过常规方法预测的安全泥浆重量(MW)通常过高,因为预测安全泥浆重量不会在井眼周围产生剪切破坏。针对上述问题,提出了基于应力分布模型,破坏准则和突围宽度模​​型的井筒稳定性分析半解析模型。 Mogi-Coulomb准则(一种新的真三轴破坏准则)包含在此半解析模型中,以确定剪切破坏。推导了不同故障模式下最低和最高安全兆瓦的计算模型。提供了该半解析模型的数值方法和流程图,并在Matlab软件中开发了计算机程序。系统分析了破坏准则,应力状态和突围宽度的影响。最佳井径已针对不同的应力状况进行了优化。结果表明,根据Mogi-Coulomb准则预测的最低安全分子量始终低于Mohr-Coulomb准则。最稳定的钻探方向是沿着NF和NF-SS应力方案的最小水平应力,而沿着SS,SS-RF和RF应力方案的最大水平应力。如果使用突破宽度模型,则最低安全分子量始终低于传统方法。传统方法和新方法之间的最佳井径和井眼稳定性不同。最稳定的路径始终是传统方法的水平井和偏井,相反,此新方法始终是垂直井,这与实际情况更加一致。这些结果还表明,通常允许在实际钻孔中发生可接受的破裂,并且钻孔仍然具有足够的弧度以支撑井眼壁并防止坍塌事故。最后,传统方法和新方法都应用于现场案例研究。结果表明,通过突破宽度模型和Mogi-Coulomb准则的集成预测的最低安全MW最接近实际MW,而传统方法预测的最低安全MW已超过实际MW。它也说明了传统方法在预测井眼稳定性方面过于保守,而这种新方法对于井眼宽度模型和MG-C准则的集成更为准确。该研究可以为优化钻井实践中的井道和兆瓦提供支持。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号